No.Clinton could not even organise keeping his zipper up!
2006-08-04 20:39:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by xkss3 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Clinton had nothing to do with the 1993 WTC bombing.
President Bush had nothing to do with the 2001 WTC attack.
Some Americans want to believe, so badly, that our Presidents would do something this horrible, is just sick. Those Men are both great Leaders, Fathers and Americans. They may have their faults, however planning the deaths of Americans and foreigners, is not one of them.
2006-08-04 20:55:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by askthetoughquestions 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could spend all day discussing everything bad about Bill Clinton. He did not arrange the bombing of the WTC in 93.
2006-08-04 20:35:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Which planet did you come from? Bill Clinton did many bad things but he is not responsible nor is George Bush of any bombing of an American Target. Bill just used a few Tanks in Waco and a few storm Troopers to oust Elian Gonzales. Thats a minor note.
2006-08-04 21:02:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so, I used to live right next to the very storage place where that bomb was assembled. scary. I dont remember seeing Clinton there.
2006-08-04 20:35:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shangri-La 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eh? There's no evidence at all to that, nor did he or anyone in his administration gain from it. In fact, it's a real bad mark on his record.
This of course, is completely different from the 911 and Bush/Cheney situation.
2006-08-04 20:36:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by lip11 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he collected on an insurance policy from that. Absolutely! I also think JFK staged his own assassination so that he would be remembered throughout history. Maybe we can call up Oliver Stone and Michael Moore-on to settle this once and for all.
2006-08-04 20:37:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by haterade 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
geez... the "conspiracy theorists" have more evidence linking Bush to 9-11 than the Clinton WTC thing...
but both are pretty sad attempts to me...
2006-08-04 20:38:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he was smart enough YES. I think he just paid his moronic ground worshipers to do it so he could just get the check for it.
Perhaps it was Hillbilly, or wait, HILLARY, running the show (like she was anyways since she had him by the balls in everything, except when he was getting you-know-what done by you-know-who).
2006-08-04 20:37:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. And that happened in 1993, actually.
2006-08-04 20:32:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋