English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i accidentally downloaded a movie about 9/11. a documentary really about how the attacks on the towers was all done by the U.S government. it had pretty good facts and footage AND proof that the government did do it themselves. the whole point, supposedly, was done so the president and whoever else would collect a large insurance check. im starting to really believe all of this. does anyone else?

2006-08-04 19:38:06 · 29 answers · asked by Angiee. 3 in Politics & Government Government

the link on the movie said loosechange911.com. it also said that theres supposed to be movie about all this coming out soon. im not sure when though

2006-08-04 19:47:29 · update #1

also it did say that osama bin laden had NOTHING to do with this. ok im not so sure i believe this part but they said that the U.S. just wanted a reason to invade the middle east. i think everyone here trying to say that im stupid for even asking this or believing in it should watch the movie before they start trying to back up the government or before they start judging people who do believe in it

2006-08-04 19:52:04 · update #2

29 answers

I have seen that movie. I don't know if I 100% believe it, but I think it brings up some good points that people should know. After watching it, though, I had this feeling that while they were presenting all these "facts" there was a lot of propaganda being used to make you feel that the facts were more genuine then they actually are. All I can say is that I don't think we know all of the truth about 9/11 and that the American people deserve to know what really happened that day.

2006-08-04 19:44:37 · answer #1 · answered by rachelinjapan24 2 · 14 9

Hi,

Regarless that this story is true or fake, (very possible to create anything nowdays), one thing is sure... When this 9-11 happenned, my personal question was...: If they wanted these buildings down, would they not have hit LOWER then the last few stories? Logically,yes...
Secondly, if a plane were in mechanical trouble in New-York, where would it do the least damage if it ha to crash anyway?
One of the best place would be the last stories of the highest highrise...= no children, no cars, no brige damage, etc...

Thirly, if the plane would have been an "Air Italy" plane crash,
would USA have bombared Italy? ... Not so...

Fourthly, when a fatal event like this happens in other countries... do anyone else declare WAR on crashing planes?
No one does...

Fifthly, if an attack is believed to be... then the OFFICIAL INTERNATIONAL way of doing things in to CLAIM an INQUEST
fron UNITED NATIONS... an WHY?... simply because UN was CREATED SO... to be on OVERVIEWING any event or possible event that may lead to an International conflict or war... SO, WHY
WAS AN INQUEST NOT REQUESTED BY USA? In repect to ALL other countries this SHOULD have been the PROPER way...

Sixly, ... and I am sorry for all the people that don't realize this, but, by declaring that it was a war attack event, NO INSURANCE POLICY HAD TO BE HONORED FOR THE VICTIMS OF THAT EVENT... and so, Bush saved a lot of Insurance Companies from Bankrupcy... ,but the families of the victims became victims as well...

Yes, unfortunatly, this is the truth, regardless if the new film story is TRUE OR FAKE....

It is so unfair to the American people to have a leader that can decide SOLY and TOTALLY SOLY on WAR ISSUES and the faith of their country and thus, the faith of the world...

Bush by not going through UN for approval or disaproval, only acted as a person seeking self-justice...and THAT is certainly forbidden, like it or not.... He took a chance..because if 3-4-5 countries would also need to protect their own interests, in oil for example, they could also have turned to WAR to defend their own need of supply... and guess... that could be exactly how World War Three could begin... Yes, because of ONE SOLE MAN....

What to do NOW .... and in future...?

Why not give UN the ROLE they HAVE...?

Every other country will RESPECT UN why not USA??

USA may actually be the one to induce a 3rd world war
eventually... weather the US people want it or not... It
is simply HOW MUCH POWER the President has...

Truly, most people simply don't know this....

2006-08-04 21:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Please get your head out of the sand. Who was behind this so called documentary? Michael Moore-on. Site some so called facts. How would the President collect on insurance money in New York city? I'm sorry but this would have come out because too many people would have to be involved to carry such an attack out. What info do these documentary people have that is not priveledged to the Democrats in the government. If they had it, they would have used it in the last election. It's all BS, just like the forged documents that Dan Rather had to hurt the President. Don't be an idiot, even though it is your right to be in this country.

2006-08-04 19:51:39 · answer #3 · answered by haterade 3 · 0 0

Conspiracy theories abound. All I would say that is that the truth is a bit more complicated than an insurance cheque!! Some would argue it is intricately tied up to the middle east and US involvement in there and the US wanting to gain world sympathy and support in taking military action to further it's gains out there. However there are so many motives and people covering up that the real story will never probably be known. Suffice to say it seems a little convenient that not one, but two jets were hijacked and flown through one of the most policed airspaces in the world and able to cause damage on the scale of 9/11 without challenge of apparent detection.

2006-08-04 19:47:09 · answer #4 · answered by waggy 6 · 0 0

No. It's one of those crazy conspiracy theories that goes around every time something like this happens.

Apply Occam's Razor (the simpelest answer is often the correct answer). To carry out what you're talking about, there would have to be literally hundreds of people involved in the scheme, from the President of the United States all the way down to the lowly grunts who would have carried out the task. A conspiracy that large cannot possibly survive 5 years without someone with direct knowledge coming forward.

Was the government response slipshod? Yes, absolutely. But to say that they directly caused a national tragedy? Sorry, that goes into the "crackpot" pile.

2006-08-04 19:44:34 · answer #5 · answered by spotts1701 4 · 0 0

Adolf Hitler got his men to blow up the German House of Parliament , to create terror in the population and allow his election as dictatorship of the state.
President "Push" family were related through business connections to these people and the new German cause
Everyone is concerned by conspiracy theories.
History shows that conspiracy theories are a form of politics not a fairy tail.
From the earliest days of Rome ,to the appointment of Sudan Hussein in Iraq helped by the USA.
History does not change but people only believe what they are told by the controllers of power.
Never be afraid the question the truth.
Everyone in the world now knows the USA government did this as a smokescreen, so they had an excuse to invade the middle east to procure the oil for their own purpose
America wants to control the world oil
So if you delve deeper into this question you will find the right answer
Yes they did and everyone in the USA fell for it, as we did in Australia however we know the truth now

2006-08-04 19:56:10 · answer #6 · answered by greeneyedaussie22 2 · 0 0

Don't believe in theories. They are a dime a dozen and made up by people who have nothing to do in their lives except make up theories. There are at least 50 theories on President Kennedy's death. 20 theories on the Hindenburg disaster. A million theories on flying saucers and so on. 9/11 was a terrorist act plain and simple and the US government had nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Did other governments have something to do with it? I don't know, but perhaps? The buildings collapsed because they were constructed poorly and cheaply. No steel and concrete like the Empire State or Chrysler buildings. New design by an engineering firm that should be tried for crimes (along with Al Gaeda) against humanity.

2006-08-04 19:49:18 · answer #7 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0 0

You're confused. The man who owned the Twin Towers took out additional insurance shortly before 9/11, that's true; but it's not a conspiracy. People who own expensive things like skyscrapers also buy insurance. No big deal.

President Bush has an Ivy League education but he thinks that "misunderestimated" is a word. He's nowhere near smart enough to pull off a hoax involving so many people and machines and buildings.

No conspiracy here, honey.

2006-08-04 20:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Yes, absolutely.
The US Government needed a reason to invade the middle east. They didn't care who. They just want control.
The American Gov't are the worlds most evil organisation.

2006-08-04 19:47:12 · answer #9 · answered by davantshe 2 · 0 0

I believe some of it to an extent. I also have seen videos of the attack and such, especially to the Pentegon. That was interesting.
BUT,
I do NOT believe Pres Bush had anything to do with it. He was just clueless almost.
Else why would he go rampage on the nations that breed the terrorists??

2006-08-04 19:44:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't believe it was the US government that planned it, persay.

But I do believe that there was a hell of a lot more that went down than just 'terrorists', and I do believe the US government played a big role in bringing it on.

2006-08-04 19:42:32 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers