Which of these records currently held by Sampras will be tough to break (six straight yrs as number 1, 7 Wimbledon titles or 14 grand slam singles titles) So in other words, which of these 3 records will be the most difficult for Federer or any other future superstars to break.
2006-08-04 17:48:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anirudh T 3 in Sports ➔ Tennis
MOST TIME IN No.1 SPOT WILL BE THE TOUGHEST FOR ANYONE.
2006-08-04 20:29:38 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
14 grand slam tititles. Pancho Segura and Bill tilden all spent more time at #1. Federer will most likely break the Wimbledon record, especially wirh the lack of competition. Winning 14 majors will be the trick. Just staying healthy to be able to contend would be imprssive.
2006-08-05 02:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by messtograves 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time at the top is the hardest hardest to break since an injury could do what his peers haven't been able to do - knock him out of #1.
It took 60 years for someone to beat Lou Gehrig's consecutive game record - and all ball players had to do was play an inning - and not even play well.
2006-08-05 04:20:31 · answer #3 · answered by scourgeoftheleft 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million) specific. information are meant to be broken. specific all information are meant to be broken yet what are the statistical opportunities? quite not likely his attempt information would be broken, his ODI information are not that common the two, Kohli isn't any Tendulkar everyone who's seen Tendulkar at that age knows that. Will any participant be waiting to final that long to interrupt information? or the boards even provide them that threat? With each and all of the hot leagues and T20 will sufficient cricket additionally be performed to have a raffle to interrupt those information? the two Ponting and Kallis have failed for this reason a techniques. individually i think of a few of Tendulkar's information be untouched for what ever reason, not inevitably somebody could not have the potential. super gamers like Sobers, Gavaskar, Richards, Lara, Tendulkar do not come that sometimes. additionally do not forget with plenty T20 will batsmen even have that staying power, ability and skill to interrupt those information?
2016-11-03 22:25:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
beat the 14 grand slam titles. but federer has the potential to win 15
2006-08-06 07:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excluding the 3 records you already cited, I think it will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for any current or future tennis player to beat Sampras' MOST BORING TENNIS PLAYER EVER record.
2006-08-06 19:34:05 · answer #6 · answered by jeff spin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the 1 hardest for federer is staying number 1 look at it we our know having supreme players that r beginnig to recognize is game and defeat him. Being no 1 for a few more years with nadal around will be tough as nadal is improving more and more and is not getting weaker as more players see how federer plays more and more,more people will know his statics as last year with gasquet
2006-08-05 17:45:24 · answer #7 · answered by mimi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think all of those records are within Federer's grasp. Right now only Rafael Nadal seems capable of challenging Federer at the top.
2006-08-05 01:59:46 · answer #8 · answered by jimel71898 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
6 years at number 1 is hard due to the threat of injury, just one injury for half the year would mess that up. He has plenty of time to win the titles.
2006-08-05 06:23:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
six straight years as no 1
its tough but not impossible for federer
2006-08-04 17:55:00 · answer #10 · answered by Stevie-G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
six straight years as number one
2006-08-05 20:08:45 · answer #11 · answered by criz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋