yes or no and y
please explane
2006-08-04 16:05:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Yes. You'd need about 1800 cubic feet of Helium. Please check my answer for your other question regarding an inflatable suit. I have done the calculations for you.
2006-08-05 00:29:34 · answer #1 · answered by polloloco.rb67 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You would need several thousand cubic feet of helium. You would suffocate if you breathe this too, you need oxygen. How about tying some weather balloons to a lawnchair instead?
2006-08-04 16:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It would take a few THOUSAND cubic feet to lift an adult human. Basically...enough helium to fill an average house
2006-08-04 16:10:39 · answer #3 · answered by David T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why don't you try air gliding that simulates free floating and flying in the air. Remember at certain heights the atmospheric pressure can destroy your eardrums. or get one of those gizmos that James Bond uses to fly with controls.
2006-08-04 16:47:46 · answer #4 · answered by rosieC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, you might float away, but if you dont have oxygen you would be a dead floating thing in a ball, fly no, flying denotes the ability to control the flight, you would be a big balloon with no steering.
2006-08-04 16:18:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no you should watch the mythbuster test with the helium foot ball that explains it
2006-08-04 16:09:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
stuff like that can ALWAYS be popped. somehow, the helium will escape, and if it didnt, you would die anyways.
2006-08-04 16:09:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
under no circumstances attempting is WORSE! with the aid of fact in case you think of approximately it, you ought to actual attempt some thing new and fail at it perfect away, yet failing is what facilitates you learn! Failing facilitates you artwork out the thank you to superb the blunders! with the aid of fact if we under no circumstances failed quicker or later in our lives, needless to say each and every thing we've performed is purely too user-friendly for us! and there is somewhat no longer something exciting approximately some thing being way too user-friendly for us! think of of this as a video sport. in case you fail at a undeniable point multiple situations, that's ok, with the aid of fact as you artwork out further and further tips about the thank you to edit what you're doing incorrect, you're able to easily beat that time! yet once you under no circumstances attempt to triumph over that time, then once you invite a pal over to play the comparable sport and you're hopelessly failing to bypass that time, you would be embarrassed! in case you under no circumstances attempt, you will under no circumstances understand. yet once you fail, a minimum of you would be wanting some power to triumph over your previous errors! base line: in case you do no longer attempt, you will fail quickly. yet once you attempt and fail, you will finally discover ways to get stable at it in case you preserve at it.
2016-10-01 12:02:10 · answer #8 · answered by rajkumar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
potentially, but it would be VERY impratical, and you wouldnt have air, and when it busted do to pressure, you would die.
2006-08-04 16:10:07 · answer #9 · answered by carson 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋