So tell me this:-
1. How come some of the hijackers are still alive?
2. Why the commission disregarded William Rodrigues' statements about explosions in the sub levels of the trade towers seconds before the planes hit?
3. Why Bush stopped FBI agents from arresting Al Qaeda members prior to 911?
4. Why none of the hijackers names are on the passenger lists of the hijacked flights?
5. Why none of the hijackers names or on the list of autopsy reports of the passengers of the flights?
6. How come 3 of the 4 black boxes were found at the trade centre wreckage but that was never revealed?
7. Explain to me why evidence of thermate was found on the steel at the Trade Towers and WTC7?
8. Why did it take so long for NORAD to respond to the hijacked jets?
There are many more questions that I could ask but I just want to see your answers to these questions.
I refuse to put up links because I took the time myself to investigate these questions and you need to too.
2006-08-04 15:27:00 · 23 answers · asked by <•>U4IK ST8<•> 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
@ cucumberlarry1 - Do you believe everything you see on your TV? Like CNN and Fox and the like??
2006-08-04 15:30:54 · update #1
@ jsin78 - I have watched all of Alex Jones' productions including his latest Torror Storm, his best yet!
2006-08-04 15:31:55 · update #2
HAHAHA this is amazingm not one person yet has answered one question. This proves my point that Americans are ignorant of the TRUTH!!
2006-08-04 15:33:24 · update #3
Some other little coincidences...
How did they demolish building 7 so quickly with no advanced planning?
Why did Marvin Bush, head of the security firm responsible for the WTC, pull bomb sniffing dogs out of the buildings days before 9/11?
Why were 5x as many put options bought for the airlines that day than are normally bought?
Why did the government switch the authority to have NORAD stand down to the Vice President?
Why did NORAD stand down on 9/11?
Why did the mayor of Washington DC get a call from Condy Rice telling him not to fly that day?
Why did Larry Silverstein take out a 3.5 Billion Dollar insurance policy only 6 weeks prior to the incident?
Why was the wreckage not investigated?
How is it that the steel fell apart in almost perfect symetry and was removed from the site immediately?
How is it that the buildings fell straight down at freefall speed and land in their own footprints?
Why was the gold beneath the WTC removed (read stolen) when
nobody knew the buildings would collapse?
How did the object that hit the pentagon penetrate their Air Defense missile system?
How can people ignore the fact that Wolfowitz wrote about the necessity of a new pearl harbor to allow globalists to take
the nation to war?
How obvious does it have to be that Bush and the neo-cons intentionally caused 9/11 before someone will do something to
the enemies of the constitution and republic?
2006-08-04 15:36:55 · answer #1 · answered by keats27 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It had been a long time since we had experienced a hijacking. The typical scenario what that the plane would be flown out of country, the hijackers would escape, and the people would be flown back. Its happed numerous times. That was how the hijackers were able to keep people calm (except on flt 93 when the real plan was discovered). That is why we never shot down any commercial aircraft. You don't kill everyone on the plane because a schedule is messed up. That of course may be the course of action in the future.
Thermate is used for cutting metal in construction. The metal structure of this building would have been filled with it. Please note the internet stories all lead back to one person who makes this claim. Not substantiated anywhere else.
Contrary to what you see on television, black boxes are not recording. There is the cock pit recorder. Black boxes typically only reports functions or alarm events on the mechanics of the aircraft.
For example the angle of the alerons(SP) may be known, but the speed of the air craft may have been in another box.
and if you recall many people were not autopsied. there was nothing to autopsy. Remember people digging and thankful to find even a finger? And these guys were in the the cockpit, the initial impact, fire boom....you know the story.
The Hijackers use assumed names, but phone calls were made before the crash and it was easy to identify the middle eastern men. though rental car reciepts, hotels, notes left. etc.... simple work for the talent of the FBI
There was a credible threat in early August and security was standing down. There was never any orders from President Bush to not arrest Al Queda. They knew they exisited but who did you want them to arrest? You needed charges. Thus the reason for the patriot act. Perhaps we could have moved faster.
The one hijacker that is still alive is now in Prison. Remember the trail.
the William Rodreguez story is one reporters tale. I could only get her interview of him. The 9/11 commission wouldn't have shut him down. The commission was made up of Democrats and republicans and they were very vocal.
I realize this is not in order, but I did my homework and I still believe what I saw on that day and it was caused by Terrorist.
2006-08-04 16:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1-well, you don't know if some of the hijackers are still alive, because they could just be other people with the same name, after all, there are thousands of people in america named michael smith...2-i don't know that answer.... 3-probably the same reason clinton didn't arrest them before 9-11 whatever reason that is, i don't know.....4-i don't know that either.... 5-i don't know i have never seen the autopsy reports.... 6-i don't know...7-i don't know why evidence of thermite was found, i thought that they never did any research on it just shipped it away to be disposed of.....8-this could be one of a couple possibilities, either NORAD didn't respond because they actually are that weak, or were that weak prior to 9-11,OR the other theory is that the "terrorists" really were smart enough to know that much about NORAD to do it when they knew NORAD couldn't respond, just at the right moment(doubtful too) or that bush orchestrated it(which i still find hard to believe)...any more questions....?...( i hope this helps you)
2006-08-04 15:52:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Watch Alex Jones'
911: A road to Tyranny
www.infowars.com
2006-08-04 15:30:45 · answer #4 · answered by jsin78 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Danger Will Robinson! Conspiracy theory cuckoo just over the horizon.
I suppose you believe that President Bush had a remote control device and personally flew the planes into the buildings from the Oval Office. Surprisingly there are some Americans who believe that story.
He must've had a clone in that classroom where stories were being read to children when the attack took place.
Wow! I'm sure glad you're out there looking out for us.
2006-08-04 19:22:18 · answer #5 · answered by Charles C 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok so what do YOU think happened??
Im sorry I do not know where you are going with this. Are saying the planes never hit?? I mean ...??
Not every tragedy is a big conspiracy
Your so stupid! Americans aren't ignorant, why can't you just accept the truth instead of looking for lies in everything that happened? Why cant people just accept something, instead of making into to some big issue?? Too bad you werent in the towers that day to see what happened first hand!!!
hey by the way, who shot kennedy??? You seem to see through everything....
2006-08-04 15:31:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
>>I refuse to put up links because I took the time myself to investigate these questions and you need to too.
No, I don't. But, thanks for the two points. Um, do you believe everything you read on the Web? I have a son just like you.
Autopsy reports????????????????????? Boy, that would be great forensic science. Who on earth told you there was enough left of the bodies to do autopsies.
Pay no attention to this guy, unless you have some good swamp land to sell. And, don't bother to search, because this is pure malarkey.
2006-08-04 15:34:31 · answer #7 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know. Any story or event can be challenged as to whether or not it really happened or happened the way reported. After seeing a show on TV I am not sure if people really landed on the moon.
2006-08-04 15:31:57 · answer #8 · answered by Amy >'.'< 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1] there not. 2]were none. 3] he didn't . 4] they were . 5]burnent . 6]watch the film . 7] none there . 8] 1 point for that but nobodys perfect . you just read the wrong book . but i guess you believe what you want to
2006-08-04 15:43:59 · answer #9 · answered by k dog 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe the official story at all...if you want a conspiracy theory to poke fun at, poke fun at the government's...the theory that a bunch of Muslims conspired to attack us.
Personally I think it's easier for the masses to think that Muslims attacked us instead of our own government--I think George Orwell said something to the effect of people will believe what's more convenient to believe, regardless of what the truth is.
2006-08-04 15:34:48 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋