2006-08-04 14:54:45 · 28 answers · asked by Beckam 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
In a debate...
2006-08-04 14:55:13 · update #1
Clinton, Laura Bush its not a politician, she's married to bad one.
2006-08-04 14:57:36 · answer #1 · answered by ll_Zodiaco.Piton_ll 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heck, I wouldn't even debate Hillary. I couldn't stand to be around her that long. Let alone expecting Laura to do so. Hillary gives me the creeps. But I think Laura might just surprise some people with her intellect, just like her husband has done.
Now all you bashers can take your shots but, if W is the dummy, what does that say for your two candidates that he defeated and why does W continually out manuver the opposition? So who are the real dummies?
See the truth in the answer is: Laura is too smart to debate Hillary. She has seen Hillary's fangs exposed too many times before. Psycho case. Might go off on a shrill rant without warning.
2006-08-04 15:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK, here's an easy question. Hillary would win. Laura's not a heavy-weight. Look who she's married to. It's a bit like comparing apples to oranges. But unfortunately, who wins a debate doesn't always matter. Kerry won most of the debates with Bush in my opinion, and look who's president!
2006-08-04 15:15:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary hands down.. Hillary is a politician, Laura is just the sitting monkey that opens her mouth once in a while when George's poll numbers are down. Laura has no sense of politics and will lose a debate with damn near anyone. Plus it probably hurts Laura that she's a republican and wrong/selfish on every issue...
2006-08-04 15:01:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Laura is a beautiful low profile house-wife and always stay behind her husband,but Hillary is an excellent high profile politician and always walk in front of Billy boy.
Our strong Hillary would win a huge margin over tiny ,little lovely Laura
2006-08-04 15:09:02 · answer #5 · answered by canada2006 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only person who'd win in that debate is somebody who didn't watch it or listen to a word of it. Laura Bush is quiet almost timid. Hitlerly Clinton is loud but changes what she means every time you turn around. She is bitter and vindictive. I cannot imagion one usefull thing coming from such a waste of time. Bush would be unlikely to say anything at all different or impressive and it would probably be torture for her to be in such an event. Anything Clinton said would be gauged at what she thought you wanted to hear.
2006-08-04 15:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by draciron 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most likely Hillary..and not just because she is already in the Senate, and has been for years, in the public eye..but she has more credibility than Lara Bush. If Lara were to stand up and say something tomorrow, not many would listen..but just look at how many stop and listen to Hillary..especially this week with her Rumsfeld show down.
2006-08-04 15:06:18 · answer #7 · answered by Michelle H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton, hands down. She has actual political experience. And while I don't mean to disparage Laura Bush's intelligence, judging by who she was willing to marry, well.... I don't hold out much hope.
2006-08-04 15:03:09 · answer #8 · answered by Kara Lee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton. Shes a leader and a role model
2006-08-04 14:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by California Dreamer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a pure no-brainer. The Republicans would say Laura won, and the Democrats would say Hillary won.
Actually, it is Hillary who is the garnish... not Laura. She is a lot smarter than you Republican haters think.
Hillary reminds me of Hiawatha, Iowa. There is no there, there.
2006-08-04 15:03:22 · answer #10 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋