"We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States."
Ann continues her patriotic duty of shoving crow down the America Hater's throats.
2006-08-04 14:48:32 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's so nice to see liberals forgetting 9/11. No war necessary, eh libs?
2006-08-04 17:42:47 · update #1
I'll tell you a little something. Our unbiased press (Do you know how hard that was to type?) has done an excellent job of presenting a onesided view for so long that too many people believe that no other view is permitted. Ann is refreshing because she presents a completely different view. In response her detractors have responded by attacking not her views but, her looks. As the old saying goes - The truth hurts and that is what she is presenting.
2006-08-04 15:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by richard 2 · 10⤊ 19⤋
Ummm... You and mAnn are the America haters, moron. Ms. Coulter is one of the biggest fools to ever open their mouths. If the war it mentions is the war in Iraq, how is it a war against fundamentalism? It's a war against a regime that was head by a moderate Islamic. If wanting no freedoms and one party is patriotic in your feeble mind, you know nothing of patriotism. Sending troops to fight based on lies isn't, supporting that same war also isn't. The only way to truly support the troops is by not using them in wars such as this, and to bring them home from an unjust conflict. By your and mAnn's own words you prove yourselves to be haters of everything that makes America great.
2006-08-04 15:09:46 · answer #2 · answered by vertical732 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bushbots are the real American haters and fake conservatives.
As a true conservative, and a Christian, I say that what Bush and his bunch are doing is just plain WRONG. I'm against the Iraq war because it's unjust and UNCONSTITUTIONAL (you neo-cons know what the Constitution is, right?).
Dissension is patriotic. How can you claim to be spreading freedom everywhere, yet want to shut everyone up at home, in violation of the First Amendment?
I don't know which bunch disgusts me more--pseudo-conservatives or liberals!
2006-08-04 14:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's right Alexandra, a true conservative like Edmund Burke, Ike Eisenhower, teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, Russell kirk , William f Buckley don't start wars, president Eisenhower told the french to stuff it when they lost Vietnam, and he did not place troops there, the two liberal presidents did, after him, and Ronald Reagan would never would have done the war with Iraq, the extremes are getting more extreme, that party of Gw bush is a neo con outfit, they follow the liberal president Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy of fighting wars across the water. ww2 was different Germany declared war on us, and japan bombed pearl harbor FDR had to, and he did the right thing. this party of bush is a true Conservatives nightmare.!!!!!! Ann coulter sold her soul to the neo con devil!!!$$$$$
2006-08-04 15:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's are war against fundamentalism? Did we just launch a shock and awe attack on Kansas? Was Bob Jones University bombed?
So let me get this straight...We attack Iraq, with a secular government hated by fundamentalists and now Shiite fundamentalists are running most of the country, 100,000 Iraqis demonstrate in favor of Hezbollah today and Bush is best friends with the Saudi Royal Family who impose Wahhabi fundamentalism on their people...this is a war on fundamentalism?
2006-08-04 15:11:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism"
This statement should be evidence enough that this war has been totally orchestrated by the powers that be.
2006-08-04 14:58:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could accept as true with it a hundred%. i've got long because found out that maximum liberals have not have been given any interest in attempting to intellectually shelter their concepts. whilst confronted, their reaction has constantly been to demonize the guy or team, and then attempt and silence them.
2016-10-01 11:58:31 · answer #7 · answered by lishego 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wanna do Ann Coulter.
2006-08-04 15:00:33 · answer #8 · answered by Skänk 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter is a plagiarist and a disgrace to Americans everywhere. http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/copycatty_coulter_pilfers_prose__pro_nationalnews_philip_recchia.htm
2006-08-04 15:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fan of Ann Coulter, but that is HILARIOUS.
2006-08-04 14:55:36 · answer #10 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Annis Colder shoves alright but in the future she may find herself alone and old !
2006-08-04 14:53:12 · answer #11 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋