2006-08-04 14:34:50 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
thanks to all for the corrections yes it is the leaders or political systems not the country ( hey i screw up all the time ) so 1st one gets the points
2006-08-05 07:21:06 · update #1
Country - no. Why not? Because the country did nothing to me, just their government.
Government - yes. Which one? Parts of ours, North Korea, Cuba.
2006-08-04 14:38:50 · answer #1 · answered by Pappa Poopy 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The United States. Nothing personal, but it won't sign the Kyoto Accord. Why should the global environment suffer for one energy glutton? Then the wealth can be redistributed to developing countries, the land can be used agriculturally or as low-income housing for refugees from more dangerous regions, and suburbia will be gradually consumed by the greenery, insects, vines and animals its been fighting off its whole miserable existence.
Of course, one girl's utopia is another's dystopia...
See http://www.vhemt.org/
2006-08-04 21:45:08 · answer #2 · answered by ghost orchid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I would not.
Congratulations to anyone who thinks they can improve the world by removing one group of people from it... you have sunk to the idiotic, narrow-minded level of any of the terrorists to whom you feel so superior.
There are good people in every country of the world, just as there are bad ones in each. When--and IF--human beings realize that, they will stop making the kinds of hateful, moronic generalizations we often see hurled at Americans on TV news, these days.
They hate us--as if we're all the same and have the same beliefs. We hate them, with equal self-righteousness.
Gosh, aren't each of us lucky to have been born into the one good and honest country... the one good and honest religion...the one good and honest political system? Wow, what are the odds?
{sigh} When will it ever end?
And my fearful answer: when mushroom clouds suddenly outnumber the natural kind.
2006-08-04 21:55:40 · answer #3 · answered by Question Mark 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saudi Arabia
2006-08-04 21:37:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, your questions brings out everyone's homicidal tendencies and the traditional hatred towards a different group of people. But, my evil mind must come to terms with narrowing down to one. Hmm...I would chose North Korea (or to a lesser degree Iran). Wait a minute, my ex-boyfriend is of Iranian decent. Hmm... LMAO
2006-08-04 21:43:54 · answer #5 · answered by Maria Gallercia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um,let me think...there is really NO country that should be eliminated.and if anyone thinks so,then thats just wrong.of course there are countries that have done some things wrong,in some cases a lot,but thats NO reason 2 eliminate that country.
2006-08-04 21:42:41 · answer #6 · answered by koodlez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would eliminate all the governments by peaceful means. I figure that would give the human race at least another century, which is what it needs to colonize beyond earth.
2006-08-04 21:40:25 · answer #7 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None, because God himself has the power to destroy this mean world and he does not, just because he is love, as much I dislike some countries and what they do, I would not destroy it. Now that's from my christian point of view, if I was not a Christian I would probably destroy half of the world, based on the way we are acting.
2006-08-04 21:41:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not eliminate any countries, but I might consider eliminating some leaders.
2006-08-04 21:41:04 · answer #9 · answered by sawmill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't because it wouldn't solve any of the pressing problems we're facing now. Plus, I would be put up on charges for crimes against humanity and peace and I don't do so well in court.
2006-08-04 21:44:54 · answer #10 · answered by weirdarchives@prodigy.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋