English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Larry J., Shaun Alex., LT, Portis, or Barber?
2. Which Manning, Roethlisburger, What about Brunnell?
3. Anyone think R. Bush will turn out good as a first pick?
4. Has Houston's line gotten any better?
5. What about recievers?

2006-08-04 14:28:26 · 7 answers · asked by cuddyback 1 in Sports Fantasy Sports

7 answers

1. exactly the order you have them in - you could put tiki ahead of portis, but I have them ranked the same as you.

2. Peyton will put up twice as many points as Eli. Big Ben wins games by being efficient - this does not equate to being a great fantasy QB. Brunnell is worthless in fantasy.

3. What do you mean "first pick" -- for the saints, yes. In fantasy, he shouldn't go before the 5th round, because we don't yet know his role (unless you're in a keeper league, which changes everyhing)

4. I hear it has - if not the personnel, the scheme has improved. Apparently they're mimicking Denver's style. On the downside, Dominic Davis is already injured (not seriously, but its not a good sign)

5. What about them? 1. Chad Johnson 2. TO 3. Tory Holt 4. Steve Smith 5. Marvin Harrison 6. Randy Moss 7. Larry Fitzgerald 8. Anquan Boldin 9. Reggie Wayne 10. Chris Chambers

2006-08-04 15:55:45 · answer #1 · answered by mikep426 6 · 6 3

Alexander or LJ.. you can't go wrong with either. Portis might actually be #3 with Al Saunders in DC, and a passing game now that Washington has more than one receiver.

For QB's, I'd stay away from them all.. you can do better with Brady, Delhomme, Hasselback, and a number of others. Peyton may be good, but not if you havve to waste a high draft pick to get him.

Bush as a first pick.. is a big bust. Don't draft on potential. Draft on results and proven track record. Plus he'll be splitting the load with Duece Mcallister. I don't see Bush as anything but a 3rd down back.

Houston has a line??? They didn't do anything to help it, so Carr is going down 70 times again this year.

Receivers, there are a number of good ones. TO, Chambers, Chad Johnson, Santana Moss, Darrell Jackson, Boldin and Fitzgerald.. Any one of them will be great. Of course, there's still the Indy boys, and Torry Holt, among others.

2006-08-04 21:51:54 · answer #2 · answered by rychendroll 3 · 0 0

1. Shaun Alex, Larry J., LT.,Barber, Portis
2. Peyton, Brunell, Ben R., Eli
3. No
4. Better but still porous
5. Steve Smith, Chad Johnson, Marvin Harrison, Larry Fitzgerald

2006-08-04 21:42:04 · answer #3 · answered by rogue 3 · 0 0

1. LT, or Barber if you have a later pick
2. Peyton Manning yes, Eli Manning yes, Roethlisburger no, Brunnell no.
3. He won't be fantasy good. He'll win ROY though.
4. No
5. Steve Smith, Chad Johnson, T.O., Randy Moss, Marvin Harrison

2006-08-04 21:38:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. ill take larry johnson cause he had a terrific second half of the season last year.
2. ill take peyton manning cause he had a hall of famer caliber year last year. but if hes off the board already, take eli manning.
3. yes, cause he was so good in college and because he has deuce to learn from.
4. no, the practically did no changes to it this offseason.
5. my choices for recievers are, steve smith, larry fitzgerald, marvin harrison, anquan boldin, terrel owens or muhsin mohammed.

2006-08-04 21:36:48 · answer #5 · answered by phlp_bj 4 · 0 0

LT too consistent

manning all they way(until the playoffs start)

yes

a little but not good enough

no

2006-08-04 21:32:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lt
Manning
in thelong run yes but not at the beggining
naw
really look into Miami's chamberss

2006-08-04 22:07:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers