English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

That's pretty ridiculous.

2006-08-04 14:19:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No , with children having sex younger and younger we'd only create more criminals. But maybe we show require birth control and non-marriage relationships until maybe 28-30 because of the problem of broken homes and families, obviously 16 years old not mature enough or experienced enough decide this

2006-08-04 14:24:27 · answer #2 · answered by onespryguy55 3 · 0 1

I agree with raising the IQ standards! Idiots seem to have the most kids! lol

2006-08-04 14:24:30 · answer #3 · answered by Xtal 4 · 0 0

No, but the IQ for breeding should be set at 130

2006-08-04 14:19:29 · answer #4 · answered by the_mojo_wire 3 · 0 1

hahaa thats crazzzzyy

mostly everyone is experienced by that age

so why should it be illegal for the ppl under 30

2006-08-04 14:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

HECK NO!

But the_mojo_wire just said the smartest thing I've heard all day!

2006-08-04 14:20:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hell no. people break the 18 one all the time. every1 would break 30.

2006-08-04 14:47:07 · answer #7 · answered by 4 · 0 0

what does sexual consent mean? ummm if it what i think it is, no

2006-08-04 14:21:28 · answer #8 · answered by Kjo 4 · 0 1

then u'd be OLD. 0_o some guys might be shooting blanks by then.

2006-08-04 14:19:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

rediculous

2006-08-04 14:20:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers