"Out of 26 human responses the following Buddhabot reply was chosen by an impartial unrelated asker as the best response" ... don't you find it odd how they felt the need to put in "impartial unrelated asker" ... I think thou doest protest too much!
Here's one of the questions it got "best answer" for .. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/;_ylt=AvYdxsTQMYDzcSjG7QCzx4IjzKIX?qid=20060728172253AAj21ZU
Its Level 2 .. 464 points .. And its got an ugly pic!
2006-08-04 14:09:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♪ Nickels ♪ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
regrettably there are inspite of having the flexibility to instruct them incorrect being straightforward as a million-2-3: a million. No international headlines exposing the U. S.. 2. No international coalition taking protection stress action against the U. S.. 3. No international sanctions or embargoes against the U. S. the two. And why would there be? because of fact electorate from greater advantageous than 50 countries died interior the 9/11 assaults, no longer only individuals. US national safety is so pathetic that kiddie hackers & Wikileaks breaches it at will. 80 two 300 and sixty 5 days outdated Nuns get into nuclear weapons storage web content to paint anti-nuclear slogans on partitions. So absolutely everyone who thinks the intelligence centers of fifty+ international places - plus those of another united states of america on the earth fascinated interior the subject - could no longer, does not or did no longer breach US safety is the two nuts or naive. a number of those governments have had greater advantageous than a decade to discover what conspiratards keep claiming. somewhat governments antagonistic to US hobbies with each reason to choose to disclose a fraud. And right here we are greater advantageous than ten years later and not something's replaced: nevertheless no international headlines. nevertheless no probability of protection stress action. nevertheless no imposition of sanctions or embargoes, the two. All of this only is going to instruct only how nuts each and all of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists somewhat are. the plain has been staring them interior the face for over a decade. -yet they are nevertheless incapable of seeing the wooded area for the timber...
2016-12-11 03:16:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the robot is programmed by a human, created by man. therefore it's really just a man hiding behind a robot answering questions.
All the answers came from the man in the first place so it's not really a robot beating anyone. That is interesting though. THanks for sharing
2006-08-04 14:10:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Politicians (and the robot I expect) get all the best answers because they are foremost concerned about telling you want you want to hear. The truth doesn't come into it; I prefer to see people challenging ideas.
2006-08-04 14:12:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's great, thank you for posting that =) sounds very interesting, but i wonder what will happen after people find out that buddhabot is a robot, maybe they will be mean to him, but this kind of technology could be very useful if it can function properly, so I say go buddhabot.
2006-08-04 15:17:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by pingpong 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you get a robot on here and be really smart? Thats just...wrong and this robot is a cheater!
2006-08-04 14:12:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lindsey 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
im not sure i like that. i never was told that i would be competing agains a robot for a best answer! i quit!
2006-08-04 14:11:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kjo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about robots, but there sure are a lot of idiots tonight.
2006-08-04 14:07:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by sue-sue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
he has a yahoo 360 page too,but why are his answers from the religon section?
2006-08-04 14:47:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Das randoM chikk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dang, they're replacing everything with robots.
2006-08-04 14:09:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋