Who totally "disagrees" on the voting polls and "agrees" that the rules of this dance competition need to be changed?
What's the purpose of dancing in pairs when only one person will win this dance competition in the end?
2006-08-04 13:21:34 · 10 answers · asked by PinkKitt'n 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
I TOTALLY DISAGREE with the voting polls.......I just said that last night....I think the voting polls should count & the judges need to count as well.......50/50...
As far as dancing as pairs.......They should do that for a portion of the voting....Only in the beginning......Then SOLO's.....50/50.......
Thanks for the question...I feel better now<^..^>
2006-08-04 13:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by IdesOfMarch 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the polls, but I like the paired dancing better than the solos.
2006-08-04 20:24:55 · answer #2 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest I dislike that you do not know who lead the votes. Nat and Ang should not have been out they were great like Heidi and Benji, Travis. Ivan show how little talent he had compared to the others in the last show. Which is why I like the doubles part, yes they should have more singles since it is down to Singles. but I make you realise more of an overall look at the dancers when they have to work as a team.
p.s. Cat drive me nuts...miss the gal from last year.
2006-08-04 20:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by fl2stay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like it and i luv Travis, and it show that the dancer can do it all or not, if they are only in pairs then if one dancer screws up and the other is good that's not fair so everyone is judged equally and i dont think the polls are correct cuz i know someone who was asked to be one the show this season ( he couldn't take it cuz hes dancing in another show) but they said if he did then they would guarantee him winning! SO NEXT SEASON IF ROBERT IS ON HE WILL WIN
2006-08-04 20:24:15 · answer #4 · answered by lisathebestone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I wish it were different, and the professionals got to choose who went home and who stays. But the fact is, the show is like a variation of American Idol: the winner is decided by America. A dancer might be phenomenal technically, but might not be "entertaining" enough to American viewers. I think it's kinda screwed up, but what can you do? I think every dancer on this show since the top 20 was decided is amazing, and will continue to be amazing even if they don't win or go as far as they deserve to go. There's always the tour!!!!
2006-08-04 20:59:48 · answer #5 · answered by snooch to the noonch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the reason for dancing in pairs is to see if they can handle the pressure of not knowing what there partner will do or mess up and how they will react with it, i think that the judges should have something to do with the votes. i think allison should have stayed
2006-08-04 20:55:32 · answer #6 · answered by Jessica S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the point of dancing in pairs is to see how u can dance with others. that 's the point in winning. to be the "best dancer" you have to be able to dance solo, and with others
2006-08-04 20:28:10 · answer #7 · answered by v_tays_z 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the dancing in pairs is fine...
2006-08-04 20:51:36 · answer #8 · answered by luckistrike 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know I can't dance, nor, am I willing to try! LOL Slow dancing is fine by me.
2006-08-04 20:44:53 · answer #9 · answered by uchaboo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can dance the mummy!
2006-08-04 20:25:00 · answer #10 · answered by Ahab 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋