I would really want to interfere, it would be great to be able to talk to my ancestors and learn the forgotten truth about my direct past. But I don't think I could go through with it because even the smallest changes could cause a chain of events to build up to something huge (for better or worse, I wouldn't know).
If you've seen Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure/Bogus Journey, Charmed, Back to the Future, Butterfly Effect, (the list goes on...), you'll know that it's best to observe... Unless I had a friend like Al in Quantum Leap to advise me, then I'd interefere til I got bored.
Besides, if you think about it, today is the history of tomorrow, so observe or interfere as much as you like. Just be prepared for the consequences!
2006-08-04 13:01:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sweetz 2
·
6⤊
1⤋
I don't want that kind of responsibility. What if I do interfere and make things worse than they were before and then try again and its even more worse, like in that movie, The Butterfly Effect. No thank you. I think I might cheat the stock market just a little though :).
2006-08-04 19:58:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Buttercup 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First I would have to observe. How would I know if I wanted to interfere in an event I haven't seen yet?
2006-08-04 19:51:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Silver L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd interfere to change the future we are all currently living. How much, it's impossible to predict.
2006-08-04 19:53:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by PAUL C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would interfere. Especially if it meant I could get in on great stock and lottery numbers.
2006-08-04 19:45:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by lizardmama 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would definitely interfere and have made damn sure the attacks on 9-11 never would of happened amongst other things..........
2006-08-04 19:45:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by honeyinthelexus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would interfere. I would go back to when the so called prophet muhammed was born and make sure he didn't survive.
2006-08-04 19:44:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no i wont interfere with anything.
i would just observe.
changing or interfering would make a really big mess in history.
2006-08-04 19:48:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by fakemoonlandings 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess I'd experiment with small interferences first...
2006-08-04 19:45:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by JB 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would definitely interfere. Better to die on your feet than live on your knees!
2006-08-04 19:46:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Aussie Chick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋