2006-08-04 12:01:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
some become critics because they are nasty and talentless
2006-08-05 01:19:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The diplomatic answer would be to say that is their job, they are not always negative, some critic's write ups are positive.... they are what they are..... an individual critic is just that.. one individual's opinion based on their interests / likes / dislikes / background / who they are writing on behalf (their shared "voice" if you will).......... the undiplomatic answer could be that one considers them as jealous, bitter and twisted that they are behind the scene and someone is not writing about them........
2006-08-04 12:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by Louvra 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of critic, Mr. Vague McVagerson.
2006-08-04 12:05:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Critics are ones who failed in the profession in which they are criticizing.
2006-08-04 12:06:46 · answer #4 · answered by Jon Skywalker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they don't like your stuff or the stuff you like. Critics who like your stuff are insightful, intelligent, and nice.
2006-08-04 12:07:56 · answer #5 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats they are critics
2006-08-05 07:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can't do, criticize.
2006-08-04 12:05:10 · answer #7 · answered by strong_beautifulqueen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thay are failures who like to *****.
2006-08-04 12:17:44 · answer #8 · answered by robert43041 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How uncouth of you to say that!
2006-08-04 12:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wannabees
2006-08-04 12:04:48 · answer #10 · answered by cookedermott 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋