2006-08-04 08:56:03 · 22 answers · asked by longview124 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
wow. you are very observant.
2006-08-04 08:59:05 · answer #1 · answered by got_milk? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Daddy passed recently. Now Junior is on the go. There is a Pit Bull/Bully Dogs website and the people who run it do tremendous work in our area to promote and teach the public about the facts and the lies. They are also involved in any and everything dealing with BSL. Okay, to make a long story short, Alan flew out and met Cesar Millan and his compound. (Lucky soul) He said he has never met anyone like him and he has done more for the positive of the Pits/Bully Dogs. I also feel that way. I have seen Cesar Millan, on his shows, take on the most aggressive (human) dogs including Shepherds, Rotties, Chihuahuas etc but never a Pit. For dog aggression, yes. But never for human aggression. Classy Corgi is right. Cesar uses the term Pit Bull to cover all Bully dogs. The American Pit Bull Terrier is what I have. Daddy was a Bully dog. So is Junior.
2016-03-26 23:15:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I first of all can't believe that it was overlooked by all of the movie producers! There are definately male cows, so the udders are just plain inaccurate. You shouldn't, especially this day in age, try to confuse kids and tell them that bulls can have mammary glands! They would've been better off not having anything at all (compare it to a Ken doll, for instance) rather than something wrong.
2006-08-07 17:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by player41140 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also noticed the male bovine with an utter and thought, America really has been dumbed down.
They could have just drawn a bull without "male" parts, there was no need to stick an utter on that fellow. What idiots.
2006-08-04 09:01:04 · answer #4 · answered by JRSK007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's just a cartoon representation. Most cartoon characters are not anatomically correct. They could just as easily not have put anything there but I think that people commonly associate udders with bovines. Or, maybe it was just to be funny! I thought it was kind of comical.
2006-08-04 09:03:13 · answer #5 · answered by elk312 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I noticed that in the previews. I think whoever drew the bull obviously did not grow up anywhere near a cow. I wonder where he thinks milk comes from?
2006-08-04 09:00:16 · answer #6 · answered by Kayl Q 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny question. I was wondering the same thing LOL! Do you see cartoons, except for anime, with characters showing their genitals? I don't think so. I assume for whatever reason, they did the same with Barnyard.
2006-08-04 09:01:03 · answer #7 · answered by aaronfowlow 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was done by a bunch of ignorant city people that have never seen a real bull or cow in their life.
2006-08-04 09:00:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the bovinesque character had a gender identity crisis. The female is taking male hormone pills (that's why it has a deep voice) because "she" is really a "he" inside. What a load of bull chips! :)
2006-08-04 09:04:32 · answer #9 · answered by Silvax 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably so. Boy you are good! I didn't even think of that, except I did think why would they call "him" a cow instead of a "bull" and give him utters? That did leave a question in my mind too...
2006-08-04 09:03:44 · answer #10 · answered by Adelaide_21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They r ingnorant ppl that dont know wth a bull looks like they dont have to show the bulls sex orgens to keep it G JSUT DONT ADD UTTERS
2006-08-04 09:04:33 · answer #11 · answered by Li 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋