Ok, we all know, Bush isn't doing the greatest job. But, had JK been elected, do you think he could have fixed some of the messes Bush has made?
If you're a Bush supporter, don't bother to answer.
2006-08-04 06:38:50 · 22 answers · asked by Without a Doubt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I don't think so.
He flipped back and forth on to many issues for me to have any trust in his leadership.
I hate it when both the candidates are bad...makes me want to move to Italy where they have...like....90 candidates....
2006-08-04 06:43:45 · answer #1 · answered by mury902 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
one day yes, then the next day no, then the next day yes, then again the following day no, and so on and so on.......
I am not a pro bush person, just dont like any politicains, they are all crooks in there own right.....Sometimes you feel like a game of russian roulette would pick the presidents better than the voting process, the strongest will people to actually play the game would weed out the weak.....Oh and the war between isreal and hezbollah has been going on a very long time, president bust had nothing to do with the kidnapping of israeli soldiers, and putting a push on a seize fire would not have worked as it didnt work the last time and the time before that and the time before that, talking doesnt help, killing innocents on both sides doesnt work, clean slate, wipe out all the politicians from both groups and start fresh, but pick non bias taught people since they are all taught to hate the other, its the same here in america, just look at how we attack each other, sure words and anger and screaming isnt the same as killing someone physically but look at the effects of the young , what examples are we teaching, whether its a liberal view, republican view, or a democrate. Its as bad as when racism was a regular way of life back in the day, it just bred anger and hate and civil unrest, is racism gone, no, is it as strong as it was no but its there, so obviously that didnt work either, we have to come together as americans as a whole, if we keep bickering at each other there will never be stability never mind politics, start with or own neighbors, the fundamentals have been lost and forgotten.....Sorry about my rant just upset about how things are done......
2006-08-04 06:50:32 · answer #2 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Enough of the whole Bush-Kerry thing. I thought we had finally stopped talking about that. Nobody knows who will be a good or a bad president until they finish their presidency. Give it some time. Maybe Bush will not be so bad after all. There is a reason why he is doing this.
2006-08-04 06:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by italian_princess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel that ANY ONE would have done a better job than Bush - I don't think that we would be in the same situation that our country is facing right now if we had elected John Kerry.
2006-08-04 06:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by TME 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I am a Bush supporter and seeing how this is a free country (thanks to Reagan and Bush) I am going to answer anyway.
John Kerry. This is a guy -- his own words! -- who said he voted for the war before be voted against it.
What kind of leader is that? With Bush he picks a point he wants to get to and he goes there. He doesn't read the polls and he doesn't change his mind every 11 days like his predecessor.
That's a leader.
2006-08-04 06:47:09 · answer #5 · answered by John16 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am a Bush supporter, You are obviously a 12 year narrow minded child. Kerry would have not known how to handle any of the challenges we have been faced with. Don't ask a question if all you want is someone to agree with you.
Colin Powell said "Hiring Yes men is just a redundancy"
2006-08-04 06:49:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would have made no difference. The president only does what the special interest groups that have bought him tell him to do. Doesn't matter whether it's democrat or republican. Kerry's masters may or may not be different from Bush's masters, but both have already sold every ounce of personal integrity they ever possessed (assuming either one of them ever had any). So, no difference.
2006-08-04 06:45:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who can say ?? Everyone thought Bush would be a good Pres and look at the mess he has done !!! And these fools voted him in twice!!! I am not a Repub nor Dem, we need someone to do the right thing for all of us not their party. This is such BS, when the FU** will people wake up and stop this bullshi* and start writing your senators and congress for change !!!!
2006-08-04 06:54:57 · answer #8 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush = Evil Kerry = Lesser Evil yet nevertheless puppet controlled via the media. Does it actual count? They make no judgements besides, and that they are coming to Canada subsequent, by using fact while they sparkling out Saudi Arabian oil, we are #2 on the record.
2016-12-14 19:23:47 · answer #9 · answered by silvestre 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No what if Kerry Would have took the troops out of the war. Then We would be haveing a war over here.
2006-08-04 06:45:02 · answer #10 · answered by Supercowboyman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if he could have fixed everything, but I believe he would NOT have made things as bad as Bush has!
2006-08-04 06:43:04 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋