English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Some people erroneously think so. But why do Presidents look so old after their time is up compared to when they started. Even Clinton aged much more than 8 years while he was in office and he didn't have much to worry about seeing how the evil empire was through and the War on Terrorism was yet to start.

There also aren't any "right" answers. That is to say there are no answers/choices in which there are no consequences or drawbacks. Perfect solutions don't exist. Only trade offs.

The Social Security crisis for example. The liberals want to keep it like it is but the problem is that it won't work the same way it has because of the baby boomers and the BABY-BUST. The Baby boomers did not have LOTS AND LOTS of babies like their parents did after WWII.

If they had, there would be no problem. But we are going to have a serious strain on the system when the boomers are retired. And what folks don't understand is the work force of tomorrow is not going to support the kind of payroll taxes that will be necessary to keep the level of services we have now. Tomorrow's workers will vote for candidates that will cut benefits and lower their taxes.

Even doing nothing has consequences.

2006-08-04 06:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by John16 5 · 3 0

He always has the right answer. remember he is the President of USofA

2006-08-04 13:15:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the president will never make everyone happy

2006-08-04 13:18:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Obviously not, since Resident Bush has had none!!!

Doc

2006-08-04 13:16:25 · answer #4 · answered by Arbuckle Doc 3 · 0 0

Its not...thats why they have these highly paid advisors.

2006-08-04 14:06:26 · answer #5 · answered by Marcos 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers