Did the Bush administration make a wise decision to invade and occupy Iraq.?

Answer 1

It was probably the worst decision any of our past presidents have ever done.

Iraq used to be a country controlled by Saddam Hussein. Bush decided to invade Iraq when he saw how Saddam Hussein was treating his prisoners. Truthfully, Bush wanted that country for only one reason.....OIL! Iraq is filled with oil. I mean think about it; why would Bush care about a bunch of middle easterners and how they are living. He made that excuse along with the excuse of September 11 (which also has nothing to do with Iraq) to invade the country and its oil.

And so now an average of 100 civilians in Iraq are dying daily, not to mention the hundreds of women and girls that have been raped and killed by the American soldiers.

The war has also caused much more problems. Including the hundreds of American soldiers that have lost their lives in battle and the billions of dollars it cost America.

Before invading Iraq, Bush should have looked at his own country instead of invading a country that he has nothing to do with. Now he is forcing millions of Americans to pay over $3 a gallon for gas.

What has the Bush administration done to our country.....
simple, it has destroyed it. And not to mention destroyed Iraq. As you have probably heard in recent news, Iraq is now close to civil war.

Answer 2

Yes. Recall that the same liberal pacifists who said Reagan was going to start World War III are the same ones that want to surrender to a few thugs with a few bombs and a hijacked airplane or two. Saddam could not be tolerated in the post 9-11 era. His absence has opened more doors than it has closed.

Weakness leads to more conflict than showing your strength and fighting when a fight needs to be fought.

This is post 9-11 man. The peace dividend we thought we at the end of the Cold War was never really there. Dangers gathered and we were caught un-prepared again.

Bush knows that we have to transform the world a little bit at a time because there will come a day when technology (WMD) will be available to these tin pot dictatorships -- if they are still dictatorships.

And the more unstable these rogue regimes are, the more likely the WMD's will be used perhaps on American soil.

If you are a liberal and really want to know why a liberal should support the War On Terrorism than may I suggest reading "A Long Short War" by Christopher Hitchens (who is liberal). The man is brilliant.

9-11 was a warning.

Answer 3

Knowing that Australia is a kind of British Empire international locations that doesn't believe it topics, I might now not fear approximately the residents having weapons and combating enamel and nail. So all an invader might need to fear approximately is the defense force, reminiscent of they're. First an invader might need to take out the Australian Navy, a complete 60 ships without a airplane companies. The most effective ships that I might fear approximately are the six diesel-electrical subs. Everything else is a floor send and might be really effortless to take out with Harpoons or Exocets. Second, the Air Force. They have 20 or so Vietnam generation F111s that might be used for lengthy variety recon and as a medium bomber. They are because of retire in 2010 so if I used to be concerned approximately them I might wait 2 years. They have approximately a hundred and ten F18 combatants. Those don't seem to be air superiority combatants just like the F15 or F14 so if I acquired a airplane especially designed for air superiority, I might now not fear approximately them both. Third, having taken out the Navy and the Air Force, I might have air superiority. All that might be left to manage is the Army. forty five,000 complete, adding Reservists. Hardly a drive to fear approximately. When you don't forget how tremendous Australia is and the way deficient the roads are, it might be not likely they might mass forces if one field used to be invaded. If a number of invasion facets have been used, they might perhaps meet an invasion with 10,000 at such a lot. Lacking air duvet, they might readily be taken out with a neutron bomb or chemical assault. The ONLY factor Australia has going for them is distance from their enemies, massive measurement in their country and the capacity to burn their northern towns and to escape to the opposite facet of the desolate tract. That used to be their plan in WW II till MacArthur advised them it used to be a nasty plan. Now that you've got an suggestion of ways effortless it might be, why do it? Just precisely does Australia have that might make any individual spend the effort and time to invade? They haven't any fundamental oil fields, they aren't a "bread basket" of meals and correctly they're having drought issues, they aren't an business vigour residence, and so on. It might price extra to invade than what advantage you might get doing it. In truth, it's not valued at the concern as you might usually have the whole British Empire coming when you for those who attempted it. While the Armed forces of Australia don't seem to be a lot, you upload in all that of the Commonwealth and also you would have a challenge. Specially considering that Britain is a nuclear vigour.

Answer 4

Most likely, NO. I would love to put Saddam back in power. The guy was brutal but he kept the idiots in line.


I do feel for the poor Iraqi's, first they have Saddam and his cronies terrorising them, then the US comes and breaks everything, now it's their fellow crazies trashing the place.


Are we (US) safer, most likely not.


We like to bash our so called Friends (France, EU) but remember they have supported us in Afghanistan (remember that place?) and been a great resource for the war on Terror. Iraq, whell that is another matter.




Happy Day,

Answer 5

It seems more like a reaction than a decision. They needed to reassure themselves and the country that America is still alright, still in control. They had a number of things to hide, and they needed to misdirect our attention from them. They paid no attention to the amount of money and lives it would cost to occupy unfriendly territory.

I wish they had done differently, as I am sure they wish they had done differently. Now we must start directing our attention to the present problems. The value of questions like yours is that it reminds us of the history of the current situation, and information is always useful.

Answer 6

Answer yourself this question, after thinking this: Did we accomplish anything? Are we close to accomplishing anything? Is it worth the billions of dollars we are spending there? Do we need that money for solutions in our country? And I don't even want to mention the cost in lives. And many more like that. And then, let me know your answer, please.

Answer 7

Noops