Before you make any determnination, get the facts! Compare:
-- The BUDGET DEFICIT at the beginning of the Clinton Administration, and when it ended.
-- The INFLATION RATE at the start of the Clinton Administration, and when it ended.
-- The INTEREST RATES " " " " " " "
-- THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE " " " " " " "
Then compare these same statistics with what they are for the Bush Administration. Then try to tell yourself that Bush is better. Don't tell us. We KNOW the truth.
These are quantifiable. They are not a matter of opinion! Then add to this the crime rate statistics, gas prices, plus peace, greater respect in the world, and taking terrorism more seriously prior to 9/11. There's no comparison. Isn't it time you re-evaluated your support for Bush?
--
2006-08-04
04:18:50
·
26 answers
·
asked by
kreevich
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Both Bushes are better than Clinton.
Also, Bush's daughters are better looking than Clinton's daughter.
So any way you look at it, it's a clean sweep for the Bush clan.
2006-08-04 04:57:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay...the President has very little to do with the economy. For that, the Federal Reserve Board is hired. Funny, the same guy, Alan Greenspan, was chairman during both those terms.
Think about:
The only president who is not allowed to practice law in his home state.
The second president in US history to be impeached.
Monica Lewinsky, Yassar Arafat and a mysterious Cuban cigar.
Casa Grande.
Mena Airfield.
Vince Foster.
The list goes on and on...
But the most heinous thing ever done by BJ Clinton was to bomb the people of Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina because he got caught with his pants down.
Oh, and one other thing that comes with the territory- two words:
Hillary.
You try to have a nice day.
2006-08-04 11:27:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
-- The BUDGET DEFICIT at the beginning of the Clinton Administration, and when it ended.
-- The INFLATION RATE at the start of the Clinton Administration, and when it ended.
-- The INTEREST RATES " " " " " " "
-- THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE " " " " " " "
All of these have been better under Bush when Bush came into office.......why bother wasting my time Your another lieing scrub like the rest of your ilk
Bush improved all this and you need to look it up yourself asswipe!
2006-08-04 11:45:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't have to re-evaluate my support of Bush - I've never supported the self-righteous, simpering little worm in the first place. He's totally incompetent. He hides behind the Bible for everything and comes off as being a pious, religious person in hopes of getting the support of the conservative Christian right. Then he sneaks off somewhere and snorts up a noseful of coke. This country will be at least 10 years recovering from the damage that idiot has caused.
2006-08-04 11:28:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like your political speech. You make it seem that you would like a president to be a dictator. Many of the items that you mention cannot be blamed on the president. If that were the case, we would be able to solve all of our money problems by dismissing all elected people, and let the president make all decisions.
That would save many billions - - - and I'd leave the country.
As for Clinton, you might honor a president who sits at his desk in the "oral" office conducting the business of the country while a fluzzy is giving him oral sex. That's not my idea of an honorable man.
Also, it's against laws for anyone in a position of authority to engage in sexual activity with one of lower rank. The presidency is the very highest, and an unpaid intern is the very lowest.
Having broken that law, Clinton should have forgiven all those who were reduced in rank for having broken the law, as he did.
2006-08-04 11:41:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a republican, however, I don't agree with everything Bush has done. But, he is a lot better than Clinton!!! Clinton was an embarrassment to our country. But then again, I would rather have Bill as president again than Hilary!!!!
2006-08-04 11:55:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Carys 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he's much better. He actually does what he says he will do. He is tough and not a push over.
However, their policies on many issues are both conservative.
Clinton is one of the reasons why we are at war. Let's get our facts straight.
OH...and one more thing...some of the issues you mentioned are completely out of the President's control. Stop looking to the government for answers. He is not in control of gas prices or unemployment. Maybe you should get your facts straight.
My source? Me. I'm a political science major. You are pathetic.
2006-08-04 11:32:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by lindakb24 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Republicans in the house balanced the budget. -- Not the Clintons. As I recall it was the Clintons that wanted to tax more and spend more.
President Hillary R. Clinton?
Never going to happen man.
2006-08-04 11:25:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by John16 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton all the way Bush is a bad person
2006-08-04 11:22:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by jonathannunes2002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go Bush! Clinton was an embarrassment his "handling" of foreign affairs led up to 911. Wake up morons!
2006-08-04 11:25:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Marshal 3
·
0⤊
0⤋