Should a celebrity who sells sex appeal have to pose nude during their peak instead of during their downfall?

Question

It seems like a lot of celebrities pose nude when they are in decline careerwise and shapewise. Shouldn't they be required to take nude photos (they don't have to publish them, but these would be the photos they publish) at their peak (think Brittney Spears 3 years ago) hotness instead of when it is all sagging.

Answer 1

Yes, they should, but only if all of the fat bastards who read them are forced to *poof* disappear! *grin*

Answer 2

It would be a good idea, but a lot of celebrities are concerned with theft or misuse of nude photos for personal reasons.
However, if a celebrity only sells sex appeal, and nothing else, they really have no complaint when people want to see them nude.

Answer 3

The only reason they do it at their downfall is that they want to get more publicity, at their peaks they already are being talked about in the tabloids and dont need to show off more to obtain it.

Answer 4

I personally wouldn't give a damn about them and their nude poses. I wouldn't even get caught reading a mag with their nude photos in it. it's EXACTLY what they want you to do and what the media wants you to look at: people in desperate need of attention do desperate measures to seek attention :)) that i find dumb.

Answer 5

It would be better to capture them at their peak. But many an actress or singer who refused to do when they were hot have decided it would boost a fizzling career when they were not. It usually doesn't.

Answer 6

lol very true.....but they feel that they are so "wanted" at thier peak, nude photos would destroy them

Answer 7

Who cares when they do it, as long as they do it!
Have a nice day.