have no feet
OR
have no fingers
2006-08-04 03:32:39 · 17 answers · asked by ☆☆☆☆☆☆ 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
mixed, have no fingers on my feet....
AnswerMan
2006-08-04 03:38:48 · answer #1 · answered by The AnswerMan ? (J.L.A) 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'd rather have no feet - without fingers I wouldn't be able to answer your question! :) Plus if I had no feet I could probably get disability benefits and have an excuse to be more lazy...isn't that horrible?
2006-08-04 10:36:19 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ Luveniar♫ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now my feet are going and so are my fingers I would rather have my feet.
2006-08-04 10:36:10 · answer #3 · answered by tensnut90_99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both would be horrible...no feet I couldn't run with my children, although you could get artificial feet which would be ok. With no fingers, I wouldn't be able to run my fingers through their hair. I just love my kids..
2006-08-04 12:53:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No feet. They don't make reliable, functional prosthetic hands, but they do make good prosthetic feet. They even have fake feet and legs that function AND look moderately real.
2006-08-04 10:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by Bartmooby 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have no feet. I can still move about. I know a guy sho can use his legs, and gets around fine.
2006-08-04 13:40:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think feet are more important than fingers...
2006-08-04 12:08:28 · answer #7 · answered by Jubei 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably no fingers, not being able to walk would be alot worse to me.
2006-08-04 10:36:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no feet
2006-08-04 12:47:28 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have no feet
2006-08-04 10:51:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋