“No one should have been surprised by President Bush’s let-Israel-fight policy in the current Middle East conflict. Bush is consistent. The essentials of his approach to Israel and its enemies were adopted four years ago when the president ostracized then-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and called for democracy and reform in the Arab countries. Bush’s policy is pro-Israel in that it is based on his belief that Israel wants peace with its neighbors, but some of them don’t want peace with Israel. So Israel stands on higher moral ground Of course for Bush and those who make it their profession to engage in apologetics for his regime, such as Barnes and his ilk, terms like “democracy”, “reform” and “peace” bear little resemblance to most dictionary definitions. The “higher moral ground” on which Israel stands in the conflict with Lebanon is littered with corpses..
2006-08-04 02:48:54 · 5 answers · asked by BOYCUTE 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I completely agree, with your statement.
2006-08-04 04:00:14 · answer #1 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not for sure what you question is!!!!!!! I'm not suprised. Bush should let Israel fight its fight. He has good reasoning for not butting in in this fight. Israel unlike France and a few other chicken $hit countries can and will protect its borders and its people. As long as they are not killing people just because they are not Jewish (unlike Muslims) then I don't think that we should have anything to say or guess at. Let Israel take care of themselves.
2006-08-04 09:59:48 · answer #2 · answered by sarah a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Been watching some Fox News Channel?
2006-08-04 09:53:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
and no one should surprise by bush policy about encourage & armed pakistan against india.
2006-08-04 09:58:26 · answer #4 · answered by prithvi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what newspaper was this taken from?
2006-08-04 09:53:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋