one with at least 512MB RAM, at least 2Ghz processor and at least 80GB hard drive, at least being the operative phrase, video takes up a lot of space, not to mention, u need a good software for all your editing etc, maybe u can invest in a dell optiplex with good specs or a mac pc with good specs
2006-08-04 03:30:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by respect 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear Buddy
Anything would work Better.
But Should Have Some Needed Requirements
Get Some Cool AGP Cards with inbuild memory (at Least 64 MB) that will fasten your display over your screen.
Get RAM Approx 2GB in your BOX
Use Dual Core Processor AMD is a Advantage (Geeks only) Intel will also work fine.
Processor Should Be above 3 Ghz
Your Processor Should Have at least 2MB Cache
If your Graphics software support 64 bit technology Go ahead for 64bit processor
Use Original MotherBoard from the Vendor. Avoid using Chipsets they suck the speed.
This is for the Best system.
No Branded can support this one.You need to build your own or ask some knowledged+experienced System Admin to help you.
Use at Least 21" Monitor for Best Display. I guess you are doing some serious work.
Don't forget to use SATA,And if you can afford go ahead choose SCSI Harddisk.They are much faster and Cost effective they normal IDE type.
Regards
Alok Tiwari
2006-08-04 04:00:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by mralokkp 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That depends on how much money you're willing to spend. If money is no object, Use either Windows XP or VIsta (when it comes out), with at least 512 MB of Ram and A 2 GHZ processor. Get a big monitor and a large hard-drive. If you lie MAc better than windows, get the newest Mac operating system. I don't have one myself but I heard that the new Macs are great for video making and editing.
2006-08-04 04:38:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by s_veilleux32 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well - what you are asking can be taken as subjective and objective. To date the most powerful and capable line of computers would be PC, rather than MAC - back in the day MAC's had better graphics, but technology has changed quite a bit.
Consider the following(The facts):
* A PC you can get more viruses and worms
* A Mac you can't get as much power out of it
* Programs for both are about the same
* PC dual chips(especially AMD 64bitx2) allow for better, faster, more efficient multi tasking.
* More power and better Graphics card usually means higher heat - which can reduce optimal speed and even shut down the computer.
If I were you I would go for the best value and reliability:
I would go for the following specs:
AMD 64x2 4200 chip (I believe this to be the best bang for your buck, you go higher than this chip you pay a lot more for recieving not that much)
2 gig of RAM 500mhz or more
Graphics Card= I would have at least 256 MB mem on it.
Brands I would recommend: Acer(Best value, great machines, I currently have one and have heard from 4 friends they were really happy), Alien(if you got all the money in the world - go for these monster machines)
Brands I would not get: Hewlett Packard(I at first went for this when I upgraded my computer - right out of the box I had problems on 3 computers I purchased!!!!) - these are horrible brands, Compaq(use to be reliable - now owned by hewlett packard), Systemax(I heard not great things about), Gateway(Heard from a lot of people that these machines are horrible). Unfortunately it seems like a lot of companies are more troubled with reducing expenses while increasing short term revenues, enabling higher bottom lines.
I think some might say that intel duo core would be better because it does not take up as much power; therefore does not run as much risk of overheating. I would definetly say these chips are better for laptops - but I don't think so for PC towers.
-Hope this answered your questions
2006-08-04 03:21:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Branded Pentium IV System with 128Mb video Memory and 512 Mb of RAM is Enough for ur Require ments
2006-08-04 03:19:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mac os x
2006-08-04 02:44:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by ℑ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋