The severest condemnation of Israel's destruction of Lebanon that any Arab government handed out came not from Saudi Arabia, the Keeper of Islam's Holy Places, nor from Egypt, the largest and most powerful country in the Arab world, but from the U.S.-occupied Iraq where the U.S.-confected Parliament passed a unanimous resolution of outrage against Israel's action and the U.S.-appointed Prime Minister openly joined Syrian and Iranian demand for an immediate ceasefire.
2006-08-04 02:20:41 · 5 answers · asked by BOYCUTE 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Israel is choosing it's targets not carpet bombing the entire country of Lebanon. Maybe Hezbollah should not have taken two Israeli soldiers which is what sparked this whole conflict. More over, Hezbollah is firing missiles into Israel indiscriminately... they are killing anyone they can. Israel is trying not to hit civilians.. unfortunately they have but that's what happens when terrorists hide behind women and children.
2006-08-04 06:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by Coo coo achoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We're not living in the end of times. Sorry.
It didn't end in 1000, or 2000, and it won't end unless you start a war in the Middle East not MAKE it end.
2006-08-04 09:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's this? The new Iraqi government demonstrating some autonomy?
That ain't nothin' but a good thing.
2006-08-04 09:24:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He said "sign of times" not "end of times"
condemnation means nothing.
action is something
2006-08-04 09:36:22 · answer #4 · answered by mumin azraaq 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
huh? That's way to much information.
2006-08-04 09:25:32 · answer #5 · answered by Jill 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋