This is actually just a myth. It does have some truth to it in that someone who dances a lot is generally physically fit and flexible but the same could be true of a person who works out regularily. There are people who dance really well even though they are not fit though but because their heart has to work harder and they are less flexible they will tire quickly and not have as much flexibilty. One's danceing ability may be an indicator of how well they can entice and arouse you before you hop into bed but even that's not exactly true snce ballet probably doesn't make to many people all hot and bothered but it's probably a reasonable assumption for modern dance, latin dance, or bellydance.
2006-08-04 07:02:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by cassandra581 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well yes and no. I don't think you can judge if a person doesn't dance but if some one is a good dancer then they have a few things in their favor: Flexablitiy, Stamina and so on.
If someone is a good dancer they probably have the right tools to be good in bed (or the couch or kitchen table or where ever) but it's not out right proof.
Best of Luck
2006-08-04 08:55:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If one views sex as skills - then no relation whatsoever.
However, some dancers (depending on the dance) are trained to pay attention to partner's body and expression, so have a better capacity for correct "guesses". One the other hand, some other dancers and convinced and true narcissists, so they dont pay any attention to anyone else but themselves. So I guess it all evens out... It's give and take.
2006-08-06 16:46:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Snowflake 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally have NOT found this to be true. One man I was involved with was not a good dancer but was wonderful in the bedroom, very caring and loving, etc. Another who was, admittedly, good looking and liked to dance and show off on the dance floor stunk big time in the bedroom--all show and all about him!!! Something to think about, hmmmm????????
2006-08-04 16:48:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by llewen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a nutshell NO!
being a good mover on the dance floor is considered by the watcher to be a turn on. But has no bearing on the movers poweress between the sheets.
2006-08-04 09:32:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by lordcomplexity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've heard the theory before. Silly, isn't it? And just think: all those fantastic ballet dancers - gay for the most part - would be the best lovers in the world!
2006-08-04 08:55:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off, by your own experience you have found this theory to be false. You were there, you should know!
Now for myt answer, no. They are two separate skills. That would be like me judging a guy's bedroom skills by how well he fixes cars.
2006-08-04 08:54:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Back in the Day 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's the dumbest question I've ever heard (right next to black men have bigger penises). Why don't you ask a question that will make you smarter? You're right, there are NO good virgin dancers, their equilibrium is messed up from not haveing sex!!
2006-08-06 15:49:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To a certain extent you could...how they dance could show how limber they are, their level of inhibition, and their creativity...guess it just depends on your definition of what good sex is!
2006-08-04 08:56:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by AverageMom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes most definetly! The better the dancer the better the lover. Especially if he has rhythem..boy of boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-08-04 08:56:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wildcat from BSS 1
·
0⤊
0⤋