A few years of limited air play later. If it still sounds good and meant something to enough people ie, you hear it in a bar and everyone says 'Oh, I haven't heard this forever, I love this song' and you compare stories about what it meant to you way back when. That is a good example of a classic in he making. I think a true classic is one that stands a good test of time and people still rush out to buy the album when they 'discover' it for themselves. I'll say 10 years.
2006-08-04 03:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by sticky 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
10 years
2006-08-04 01:45:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by musiclover 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it takes a decade, the whole idea of it being a classic is that it survives the test of time, and how would you really know until it's actually done that... I hate these days when people hail a new song by some copycat 70s/80s Cheers theme-sounding band an "instant classic". GRrrrrr
2006-08-04 01:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by hilbymunky 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is really a time line, because to some people NSync and Britney Spears have "classic" songs.... but I would agree with the previous answer, 20 years seems about right.
2006-08-04 01:45:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by LK7485 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, 20 years is considered a classic.
2006-08-04 01:43:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by lunifritz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say 20 years - that's the time frame they use for cars.
2006-08-04 01:49:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by zippythejessi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
10 years... no question.
any sooner, its to early
any later, the song is at risk of being forgotten
2006-08-04 01:44:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alex M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
4 cars its 25 yrs,, does that make "The Cars" classic's yet?
2006-08-04 01:45:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by phllipe b 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
20 years seems right.
2006-08-04 01:44:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on the impact the song had on its audience
2006-08-04 01:44:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Da KiNg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋