the generalization and the exception can both be valid..its similar to the notion that there are many ways to skin a cat or reach a similar goal
2006-08-08 04:49:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm not a logic expert, but I do believe that nothing is perfect, therefore everything has a weakness, or in terms of generalizations, a loop-hole or extenuating circumstance that causes exception. Actually, I think generalizations can be good. They allow room for exceptions that can be rational and convenient depending on the situation.
Poor example, but red lights generally mean STOP, except for when making right turns, which make sense when going with the flow of traffic. Such a generalization poses no threat to the rational function and meaning of a red light, but in a way makes them more effective in performing their basic duty of conducting traffic.
I hope that made any kind of sense...
2006-08-04 10:44:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by jermaine 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is usually at least one exception, and when it is pointed out the statement loses credibility.
I see a LOT of generalizations made here, especially about poltics and religion, many of them wrong IMO. It would be more accurate to say "most politicians are baboons" rather than "all politicians are baboons".
2006-08-04 07:46:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Elle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No logic expert here but when you GENERALIZE about ...say Blacks, Latinos, Muslims...there are a 'FEW' of them WHO is the exception? Sorry to have tried to answer your question with a question.
2006-08-11 18:41:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sati 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets look at it like this, a generalization can be likened to a bushel of ripe, delicious apples. Then there is the exception, one bad apple. Remove the bad apple, and you still have a bushel of perfectly good apples.
2006-08-10 22:53:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Otter's Waters 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Generalizations are by *definition* (communally known) a loose definition of a group of items.
So I don't think it disproves it, because that is why it is called a generalization rather then a fact.
2006-08-04 07:35:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Katherine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is a generalization, it only seems logical that exceptions exists....
2006-08-11 23:26:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by scanman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not all generalizations are "wrong". They are just not always accurate.
2006-08-04 07:32:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2006-08-11 13:27:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tarique M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
atelost???
2006-08-11 22:23:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋