Will Chirac be able to sort out a middle east ceasefire. Its about time that the Europeans sort out Bush and showed him how to be a leader.
2006-08-04 00:04:51 · 17 answers · asked by paul1953uk 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was the one with the balls to defy America and Britain and say no to Invading Iraq. Has he not been proved right? If The Americans had not bullied all the African nations to side with them in the UN meetings Do you think the world would have been as dangerous as it is today? I think not.!!!!!
2006-08-04 14:18:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chirac is an old man, he's ill and got stacks of problems, from bribery to others, he's stuck in the midst of scandals he can't even escape! The only reason why he was reelected was because people would rather make do with a bad President than Le Penn! Probably reason why he will get reelected if it comes to the crunch. So no i doubt very much that he will be the man to sort George Bush out!
2006-08-04 00:14:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chirac won't lead anyone out of anything unless there is a buck in it for France and it will only be if its to France's advantage. This President knows how to lead. He is strong and doesn't fall the BS that most people spew forth. France is in league with Iran, so what makes you think he will be objective? France is also about 20% Muslim, so guess where his loyalty is? Chirac is a joke.
2006-08-04 00:13:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chirac can't sort out France. Whose immigrants are rioting and burning cars in the streets? What's the unemployment rate in France. Who was ones implicated in the oil for food scandal with the UN and Saddam? I am forced to admit though, with France's record for surrendering they should be good at drawing up a ceasefire!
2006-08-04 00:11:17 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your questions will only serve to anger certain americans. Chirac warned bush not to go to iraq.
Old europe has a good grasp of international politics. they've been at it long before america came on the scene. Britain have fought in Iraq and afghanistan and chose honourable retreat. france had fought in indochina. they know the score. I dont know the details of the diplomacy but something has to be discussed that must bring lasting peace to the middle east region. the fact that george bush is listening to chirac means he is prepared to try option B.
mind you america too had fought in vietnam. Never underestimate the resilience of the natives.
I hope diplomacy triumphs over arms.
2006-08-04 00:17:44 · answer #5 · answered by olayinka o 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Europeans should sort out Bullshit and show him how to be a leader, but both Chirac and Bullshit are war criminals. Le Pen should be president of France.
2006-08-04 00:10:45 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chirac is a fool ,he wants to be a statesman but like the scarecrow he first needs a brain,noone will listen to the whore of europe.
2006-08-04 01:31:54 · answer #7 · answered by joseph m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ChIraq, who has deep connections to the UN Oil-for-Food scandal? Who violated treaties by selling arms to Saddam? Who told Bush he would support him in the Security Council and then didn't? Who has turned a blind eye to Muslim violence in France?
ChIraq is a twit, a feeb, a scumbag - the epitome of French manhood! Vichy lives!
2006-08-04 00:30:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not, just look at the reaction to France when they opposed the invasion of Iraq. I do sometimes think that France are they only state with any morals these days.
2006-08-04 00:09:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
France have a bad history in Lebanon too.
2006-08-04 00:09:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋