hi kate .. well lebanon , palestine , syria , egypt , & many other countries in the middle east have always had jew between her population .am lebanese & i assure you that there are jews who ddon not like israel & wat it represents ..jews are not israel .however some jews who are extremely rich & others who are extremely poor & had bad luck in their original countries headed to palestine .where with the help of UK was ablee to fire out the real residents of that area who we call the palestinians & settled down .
back to your Question "no there would not be a conflct " why the hell they choosed palestine ..i tell you bcz they are idiots ..& more idiots for choosing to fight with us .
2006-08-03 23:39:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by zazou 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Great question.No they wouldn't be attacking Lebanon,they would be attacking and invading all their South American neighbours,and with the help of the USA they could have conquered the whole continent.I wonder why the USA didn't offer the Jews Texas as a Homeland,wouldn't that be a way to solve this problem TEXAS BECOMES ISRAEL and then they could all live happily ever after.Two LOVING neighbours side by side.
2006-08-04 03:50:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the chief rabbi in my city, Israel was created in breach of the Judaic teachings. Israel should not have been established in the first place. Its very existence is harming the Jewish community more than any other ethnic group. Wherever it happens to be, the Zionist entity will be a scourge and a calamity
2006-08-03 22:59:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chevalier 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the Romans had never scattered the Jews in 70AD, would there be this problem today: check the story of Samson and Delilah. Jews and Palestinians were fighting 3,000+ yrs ago.
Being the Chosen has its pluses and minuses. Just like the Selective Service: many are called but few are chosen, but bad luck for those who are chosen.
2006-08-03 22:53:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by hellbent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
first of all i consider the entire arab peopple who commented above all the lebanese ones. i'm part lebanese myslef, and my dad used to be a youngster round my age (sixteen) throughout the civil conflict in lebanon. he fought the isrealis and plenty of of hies peers and memnbers of my household have been killed via those isrealis. so the reply ot your query is not any. the isrealis have not ever gained a conflict any "victory" or "goal" accomplished via those lots used to be a victory or goal accomplished via a international vigor the U.S. serving to the isrealis. they could now not exist withou external aid. they might now not have gained the conflict in 2006 becuase HizBollah a military of 500 aid offf an navy of 5000 and didn't allow them to develop greater than three toes in a direction of ways lengthy used to be that conflict a month. besides the rocket assaults that violated the geneva conference destroyed properties and matters that-get this HizBollah used to be ready to payfor and repair. u determine it out.
2016-08-28 12:53:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
israel is right where it belongs.
and not in argentina.!
when the evil persian entity is wiped off the map
there will be peace in palestine!
2006-08-03 22:54:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by john john 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
And if your Daddy was wearing a condom that one special night! I would not have to waste my time answering your stupid question just for two lousy points at least you should send a t shirt saying
I answered his stupid question and all I got was two points and this lousy T shirt.
2006-08-07 14:06:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by iamwelndowd1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They'd be shelling the Uruguayans and occupying Chile.
2006-08-03 22:50:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by zoomjet 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because ISreal would be in Argentina..thats far from Lebanon
2006-08-03 22:51:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Black 3
·
0⤊
0⤋