I like them both, BJ had better practical jokes but Trapper and Hawkeye came up with better schemes.
2006-08-03 21:56:27 · 7 answers · asked by wudbiser 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Trapper was back when the series was a bit more light hearted, a bit funnier. I liked Trapper. He was a good counter point to Hawkeye.
When BJ joined the scene, the show had taken a more serious turn. He also was a good counterpoint to Hawkeye, but he was, at times, as serious as Hawkeye. He drew more emotion. He also had a lighter side that made his character likeable.
Really, I liked both. LOL!
2006-08-03 22:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by nightevisions 7 · 11⤊ 3⤋
Trapper John. BJ was ok but he was too stiff. even today if MASH was on and it was with Trapper John, I would watch that. If it had BJ, I could skip
2006-08-04 02:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by tonya j 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree Trapper was funnier but BJ had more heart.
2006-08-03 22:07:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jackal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your right on both counts. I've seen every episode as they were coming out in the 70's, and I still watch them all the time now. I'm partial to the trapper, frank burns, radar, henry blake ones myself.
2006-08-03 22:08:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
trapper was funnier
2006-08-03 22:00:40 · answer #5 · answered by glock509 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like them both also.
2006-08-04 00:48:25 · answer #6 · answered by peterboro_first 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm... tough one. i'd say trapper.
2006-08-03 22:34:46 · answer #7 · answered by anikins 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋