possibility of civil war in Iraq. I'm no politician, but when USA went to Iraq I knew this war will end with civil war. At that time my opinion was that Iraq needs a strong dictator (leader) for a reason. Saddam know why he was so ruthless. Iraq is a country with Kurdish, suniit, siit and they don't like each other. It is impossible to create democracy in Iraq, specially if people are not prepared for that. Are leaders in general so stupid that they cannot predict consequences of their act????
2006-08-03 20:31:26 · 8 answers · asked by nelli 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You are absolutely right... Only Bush thinks that everyone should agree with him and he is dealing with Americans, not with people with a different culture, beliefs, etc... He thinks he can change people in another country, and so do the other Americans. They cannot get how wrong they are... Well, it will take time to see that you cannot actually control another country and its people, but they will get it... Too bad, because this will lead to even more hate for the USA and more terrorist attacks... Only they are not smart enough to get it...
2006-08-03 20:39:27 · answer #1 · answered by kichka_2002 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As far as I can tell the matter isn't concluded yet.
Until we withdraw from Iraq and civil war errupts it is quite juvenile to talk about the civil war in Iraq as if you are some brilliant prognosticator.
Very often naysayers naysay a thing into happening and then claim vindication.
The same thing happened with Vietnam.
It is impossible to accomplish an objective when you have such a furor over a policy. Politicians are very much driven by fear of their constituency, so they may bail out on a potentially successful mission and concede failure without seeing the matter through to its end.
You are a self congratulatory idiot, by the way.
I say that as a person who has never voted for a single Republican politician in my entire life.
2006-08-04 03:38:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it was a temporary thing for Bush anyway since he has said that future presidents will decide the out come of Iraq 2 years ago. Bush bailed out right then...He was only there to create chaos, so they the Republicans could change our economy with their deregulation and inflation rates...Bush also used this war for his buddies to make billions off of Americans with Haliburton, Carlyle, and Bechtel corporation with defense contracts....Bush got all of this done too with in 6 years. I say he should be impeached and hung for treason with his buddies, in Boston or Philadelphia like our founding fathers would have done..
2006-08-04 05:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes Bush and Blair are both Dumb A@S Rejects....And Colin Powell tried to tell Bush before we invaded Iraq that it was a mistake, But as usual Bush didn't listen.
2006-08-04 03:41:05 · answer #4 · answered by The Prez. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've read some of your questions & answers and I'm sure you realize that if you said similar things against your Islamic country (government) that you would lose your tongue! Be that as it may, keep slinging your sh**, it's hitting the wrong people though.
2006-08-09 14:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why dont you keep on backing the savages? Get real!!!
2006-08-04 03:35:04 · answer #6 · answered by smokindoggy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What does being 'gay' have to do with it?
2006-08-04 03:34:50 · answer #7 · answered by amg503 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Stupid & as*holes
2006-08-04 03:47:21 · answer #8 · answered by politic sucks 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋