It sure looks like it. Video:
http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2682703
10 years ago, he wasn't stupid! He could actually speak (quite fast, actually) without screwing things up and saying the exact opposite of what he meant.
Gee, that'd be great. George Bush would be tried for war crimes (which is what should happen), and be found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.
2006-08-03 19:49:05 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I can speak coherently and I'm not going off on wild, screaming tangents and seeing things that aren't there, so no, I'm not experiencing post-puberty psychosis.
2006-08-03 19:57:47 · update #1
No I think its pre-demenita senility
2006-08-03 19:55:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
So in your estimation, intelligence is based on how fast a person speaks and/or how eloquent they are. Stephen Hawkings would disagree I'm sure. Once again your premise is based on a ridiculous belief. If you want to discuss whether or not Bush is lacking intellectually, do it. Based on analyzed observations of his ability to make decisions, linear thinking, critical thought processes. Don't just say, "Oh my gosh, he just doesn't talk really fast he must be mental."
These statement hurt the Democrats not the Republicans. The Dems have to win the moderates to win an election.
2006-08-04 02:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you trust what Moore says, his IQ is the lowest in the whole president list history (while Clinton has the higher).
I have the feeling he had a Pre-teen senile dementia
2006-08-03 19:55:01 · answer #3 · answered by AlienXS 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there is no 'pre' about it!
2006-08-03 19:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by jubiejubejubajube 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋