Newton is my favorite. But also Wellesley, Chestnut Hill, and Belmont are all nice suburbs and are easily accessible to downtown by mass transit. They're all safe and really pretty. Unfortunately they're not cheap - nowhere in the Boston area is cheap, but these areas are especially not cheap.
Also Brookline is nice. Although it's a separate town from the city of Boston, it's much closer to the city (actually mostly surrounded by Boston) and has a more urban feel, whereas the other areas are more suburban. It still has a lot of excellent shopping and restaurants. Most of the housing there, however, is not single-family homes but condos or 2 or 3 family homes. I live not far from there and LOVE it there. It's easy to get to downown from there as well.
2006-08-04 05:58:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mike R 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Newton, MA is about 20 minutes from Boston, and has often been voted as one of the safest cities in the country. Newton Center has cute little shops and coffee shops, etc. It has gorgeous home, and a great school system. Another cute small town is Arlington, MA. Not too far away from anything, but still doesn't have that downtown feeling. If you'd like something slightly less like a suburb try different areas of Cambridge.
2006-08-04 01:42:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ShouldBeWorking 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
to 3 quantity, sure. My husband works the Chicago Marathon according to annum, and he commented final night that if he'd been doing the comparable interest in Boston, he could have been perfect in the area of the explosions. of direction this delivered residing house the certainty of the attack in a fashion no longer something could have, and that's made me worried concerning to the potential of a copycat attack in October, whilst the Chicago Marathon would be run. apart from, I as quickly as called Boston residing house and understand the section the place the explosions befell particularly properly. I lived interior of sight and used to flow out to cheer on the Marathon runners each and every Patriots' Day. That, too, made the form greater actual to me. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, I knew somebody who died on 9/11, and as undesirable as this tragedy is, it pales in assessment, although no longer, I comprehend, for the family members of the ineffective and critically wounded. to boot, my instincts are telling me that this exchange into no longer an attack by using foreign places terrorists yet quite the artwork of a homegrown nutcase. That someway places a different complexion on the concern, although of direction i should be completely incorrect.
2016-10-01 11:13:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ja 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
newton, belmont, winchester, lexington, wellesley are the towns that you described.
you could also check out needham and natick, a bit further out and not on the same tier as the towns above. concord would be in tier 1, but i'ts about 40 minutes to north station on commuter rail. and sorry, but i just can't think of arlington as "upscale". i LIKE arlington, my favorite little japanese restaurant is there, and i even lived there years ago, but it's not upscale.
also, if you want to post where you live now that might help. i'm from boston originally, but i just moved out of SF about 5 months ago (SoCal now) so I know that area also.
http://trip.mbta.com/cgi-bin/itin_page_dhtml.pl
http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=mg2terminal&L=3&L0=Home&L1=State%20Government&L2=Local%20Government&sid=massgov2&b=terminalcontent&f=cc_landing&csid=massgov2
2006-08-04 04:20:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mikal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Belmont, Newton, Lexington, Wakefield, Arlington, Chestnut Hill are what you are looking for. Very nice, upscale towns.
2006-08-04 02:54:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by hidgoeshollywood 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope you have lots of money living in or near Boston is extremely expensive but such a beautiful place to live.
2006-08-04 23:34:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by nastaany1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://www.cityofboston.gov/
http://www.boston.com/
2006-08-04 01:30:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋