why is Lollapalooza in chicago?
why not San Fran? or something like that. it seems like it would be fit better there?
why did they choose chicago?
2006-08-03 18:38:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
From the MySpace page:
"I'm a big ol' sexy thing, brimming with music and art. I've been around the block a time or two, but now I've settled down because I'm in love with Chicago. I'd rather go one-on-one for three days with the Windy City than make a splash here and there. I run with a pack of 130 of the best bands in the world. My family thinks I have ADD because I have 8 stages going off at once. They're just jealous. They just wish they had enough energy to serve up all the best music, local munchies, technology, killer art, and take care of the kiddos all at once. This year it's all going down August 4-6 in Grant Park. "
2006-08-03 18:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by Jim T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chicago is in the middle of the country. Are they only having one setting for it? I went several years ago in Milwaukee. That just got too long for me after a while, but it was a pretty good time none-the-less.
Chicago is an amazing city to discover.
2006-08-04 01:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by Polly 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm on the train tomorrow. 3 day pass. San Fran too far away. Watch for tremors.
2006-08-04 01:42:41 · answer #3 · answered by busterp 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Move to chicago, is what I suggest....Get over it.
2006-08-04 11:04:27 · answer #4 · answered by Danyizzle 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bco'z u didn't distup her at chicago
2006-08-04 01:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by kalpesh s 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
doesn't it still tour nationwide, at least it used to.
2006-08-04 01:42:04 · answer #6 · answered by sixteensgrl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋