What i am trying to say that can u beleive how well callleri is playing after wimbledeon.it like right now he the mini federer. ever since wimbledeon ended calleri hs been playing amazing tennis and maybe he not mini federer but he playing all the clay tournaments good so maybe he mini nadal.just listen
Bastadd(clay)-he made it to the semis finalsafter losing to nikolay davydenko of russia but along the way defeated a clay specialist nicolas almagro of spain who won a tournament on clay this year in valencia
Amersfoot(clay)-made it to the quarter finals losing to guillermo coria but pass through another clay tournament champion this year who is danielila bracciala of italy who won casablanca
Kitzbuhel(clay)-he won the title aganiset argentina juan ignacio chela plus beating top players like nicolas massu(chile),gatson gaudio(argentina),and fernando verdasco(spain)
Sopot(clay)-he has know reach the quarter finals
what do u guys think about that.if only he was good in other years
2006-08-03 17:43:26 · 7 answers · asked by mimi 3 in Sports ➔ Tennis
please dont write things that calleri will never be able to be at high level with nadal and federer around or calleri can never step up tp nadal and federer hight because that not the question.
2006-08-03 17:45:47 · update #1
I like Calleri game, and He can improve a lot, who knows if he could get that level
2006-08-04 01:30:36 · answer #1 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't say that Calleri is going to Federer's level because he's never gonna go to Federer's level. It's impossible!!! That's a bad question. I should say that Federer is the best!!! Calleri could do his best but not as Federer because he's the best and he doesn't want to lose. But Nadal can be the best if Federer can't beat him at the French Open. That is the big problem for Federer because Nadal is Spanish and in Spain they just have clay courts so Nadal just practices on clay courts and he plays best on clay courts. Everytime that Federer plays against Nadal on clay courts, he always loses. so that's why Nadal wins more againts Federer than Federer beat Nadal. Federer has to practice more on clay courts!!!
2006-08-04 05:28:58 · answer #2 · answered by nvhp 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On a given day he can take down anyone...His spectacular free groundstrokes are tough to beat when are in the zone...The problem is that you need to be in the zone for two weeks to get a Grand slam. This is improbable...A bad day´, even a medium day and you´re out!!! The winners finds ways to win despite not being playing at best always...This ability is not on Calleri´s side...still.
2006-08-04 11:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by Luis V 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya he is playing well! He play greatly but he still need some experiences! Like Federer and Nadal, they boh took a long time to achieve this point and they kno how to play and specially they have their own techniques! Augustin is quite a good player, but i wn't change my mind that he can take federer place and neither is he a mini federer or a mini nadal! federer is number 1 and he'll remain it till he is defeated !! But atill Augustin is playing well
2006-08-04 04:26:45 · answer #4 · answered by Gamesr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's playing very solidly on clay, but I don't think he is Federer yet.
2006-08-04 07:15:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-08-05 21:02:20 · answer #6 · answered by sara 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think so
2006-08-04 06:42:14 · answer #7 · answered by let_me_know 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋