2006-08-03 17:38:43 · 20 answers · asked by computer_pc_doctor 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I second that, Bush is hitler.
2006-08-03 17:42:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in any manner.His image is being tarnished by pro-Bushian Medea.Secondly the tune of Ahmadinejad is only the result of unjustified intervention of America in West Asia under the leadership of Bush,who has adopted the line of action,adopted by Hitler in the year 1933-34.
2006-08-04 01:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by watan yash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well hopefully the planet never sees another "hitler" and I refuse to capitalize the pigs name.
Ahmad. is however bent on the destruction of Israel. That said he would probably hunt down every Jewish person on the planet and kill them if someone didn't stand in his way. Fortunately many do stand in his way.
It has to be disheartening to hear a "leader" say in a speech (no misquote) that another country should be wiped from the earth. Thats harsh; and yet we have American liberals here proclaiming him better then our own President. So very darn sad. Fortunately this ilk is an extreme minority and they show the vast majority their true colors.
2006-08-04 00:48:10 · answer #3 · answered by netjr 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He reminds of some psycho that AMS is looking for. Maybe someone should put some horns and some glowing eyes on him for the HELL of it. Or just some perv that passes out towels at the YMCA? Wouldn't it be great just to hang them all at once? But not a Hitler more like a cheap rip-off of Dracula.
2006-08-04 21:20:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To those anti-Bush guys who say Bush is hitler...think about it. Hitler is smart, charismatic and very cunning. Bush is just... Bush (not Hitler).
And to the question...nope, dont think so. Despite his ramblings, he isnt dealing anymore with sissy Jews within his own country just waiting to be killed, but a powerful Israel which must never be taken lightly. To be optimistic... just wait till the next Iranian presidential elections, eventually the Mullahs will get tired of "playing" with him and find someone else.
2006-08-04 00:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, It is unfair to stamp a person as Hitler if he is just not accepting the terms & conditions of USA & UK Governments (Like Fidel Castro of Cuba was never labled as Hitler).
It will be better if we call the present PM of Israel the next Hitler.
2006-08-04 01:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by I-Rahi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm gonna answer you with a question...
Why the events of a far off land has to do with you
sure, is the price at the pump
and the rest of us, what, all the flooding in the states are nothing comparing with the middleast conflict
why all the phrofecies old and new have in common that little space in the world
Do we not count, all that happen here is bull?
People in this continent, live, die, fight, conquer, survive, rise again, and prosper
but for the fortune tellers we don't count
don't put your eyes so so far away, let them do what they want
focus on us....
2006-08-04 01:11:07 · answer #7 · answered by tarjetaseinvitaciones 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
george bush is the next hitler
2006-08-04 12:29:42 · answer #8 · answered by Cornfunkel's Ghost X 3 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks like Olmert Ehud has already filled that position
2006-08-04 00:44:57 · answer #9 · answered by IRunWithScissors 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahmedinejad is a whiny little pissant. He's not planning world domination..
2006-08-04 00:44:14 · answer #10 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋