Why do Bush supporters approve of the Patriot Act, domestic spying, torture, and the like? These are all unconstitutional.
(For the record I'm a conservative Christian--hardly a liberal. Sad I have to put this disclaimer here.)
2006-08-03 17:29:20 · 11 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Several Neo-Cons said openly that the Constitution is nothing but a "damn piece of paper". Tells you what they think of America.
Dont worry Neo-Cons will just blame Bill Clinton.
2006-08-03 17:40:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps you could provide a short explanation explaining how any of these things violate the Constitution? If you can that is, rather than just parrot what other people say. Please, by all means, generate an original thought, fueled by reason and fact, if you can find the time!
Yes, you are sad that you feel you have to provide a disclaimer. It makes me think your a actually a liberal.
Oh, and what is domestic spying anyway? If you're talking to terrorist in Saudi Arabia, that would be an international call, not a domestic call. International spying, maybe!
2006-08-03 17:37:20 · answer #2 · answered by thealligator414 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is sad, is that you lie. Why, you used neocon.
The patriot act and the so called spying is all with in the law. As for the Torture so is that.
Not one person can step up and show how their rights have been side stepped. NONE.
For the spying It was oked by a judge 4 years ago and it is only used for espionage so it can not be used in court for any other purpose.
2006-08-03 17:42:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps you have not noticed that the liberal politicians do not do anything to stop all of this "unconstitutional" stuff. They just cry about it load enough so that you people that believe it is unconstitutional will vote for them. I have never seen a time in history where people are so willing to call anything that they disagree with as being something that is unconstitutional.
2006-08-03 18:07:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The use of torture and domestic spying does not have to be fightning, as long as no one knows. I'm fine with it as long as it gives us more information on the terrorist, north korea, and iran. I personnaly hope that those three "enemies" can be cleared out with peace, but if not peace they must burn in the fire of their own ignorance. The torturing shouldn't be used however to find things about drugs or gangs out,Only foreign threats to the masses.
2006-08-04 18:09:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of those are used to catch terrorists not on regular people. So the only citizens it might really unfairly hurt are Arab American who have family in the middle east. They don't really care about our regular silly conversations, and people are making a big deal about something that's nothing.
Myself I completely respect the Constitution.
2006-08-03 19:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It violates international law (the important one). And it violates U.S. law, did you people not see the report where Bush admitted this?
And there is no such thing as a liberal senator. Plenty (in fact a majority) of representatives HATE that bill
2006-08-03 18:43:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Needs updating
2006-08-03 17:34:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liar. You're a lib in sheeps clothing.
2006-08-03 17:40:13 · answer #9 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are so many people out there who blindly follow what W says; I suppose it's easier that way. If you just agree with everything the president does then everything he does will please you.
2006-08-03 18:15:37 · answer #10 · answered by Report Abuse 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋