Suppose you are an administrator at the Environmental Protection Agency.?

Question

A plant in a small town is in violation of the environmental laws. If you enforce the laws’ requirements, the plant will be forced to shut down. The plant is the major source of employment for the town, and its closure would impose severe economic hardships. Should that fact play a role in regulatory enforcement?

Answer 1

I suppose the plant would shut down, but it would be in conflict in the political chain reaction. At the expense of loss however and within that conflict it doesn't appear that the government chain gives back to that community for the amount of money they charge that plant for insurance, taxes, etc...in which should be put forward in the clause for loss due to such an event. The administrator does not have the power to do anything about such losses that is another government procedure I believe. I could be wrong. However, the question is a good once, and I'm just giving my point of view, for the sake of argument of interest I suppose, but still quite an interesting debate to inter-act with.

Answer 2

Damaging the environment will affect many more people than the closing of the plant. Your question is not valid in the first place because there are ways to bring the plant into compliance so it won't have to shut down. Sometimes a minor change will make a big difference.

Answer 3

If a company is violating laws on environmental protection. It must be notified of its violations and must be given a period of time to correct their equipment or system. If the company does not act on this notice, it must be shut down even when it provides employment because the environment will be jeopardized as well as the public.

Answer 4

I would use this information to rally the citizens of the town to pressure the company into coming into compliance with the regulations.

Power of the press, my friend.

Answer 5

are you able to checklist it as a contravention and require that they restore the matters or violations without needing to close down fullyyt... it extremely is worse harming human beings from an environmental risk or doing away with their economic earnings??

Answer 6

compromise my friend....nature needs protection, and people need to eat....find a middle ground where the factory stays open but the pollution is to a minimum....