2006-08-03 14:54:28 · 13 answers · asked by Ron R 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NO, they tend to stay behind their borders unless provoked. Even then they absorb suicide bombers, rocket attacks, protests, etc. and show more restraint than other countries. They are up against the constant threat of annihilation and terror, sanctioned by the governments of their neighbors, and still manage to survive.
2006-08-03 15:01:52 · answer #1 · answered by electricpole 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why would you think that? They are the only ones that show any restraint in the whole regain. They never retaliate until they have no other choice, how could that be considered causing problems?? All they are doing is responding to attacks by others, and only after showing a great deal of restraint.
Calling Israelis attackers is like calling the early American Indians attackers because they were defending there OWN lands. How silly can you get?? Like saying they were causing all the problems because they were defending there homelands.
2006-08-03 15:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by meimmoody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Jimmy Carter is. He unleashed the Islamic state of Iran, by undermining the Shaw of Iran. The Ayatollah Komanie was in Exile in France and he took over Iran and made Iran an Islamic state and started with the terrorism, in the 1970's they over ran the US Embassy and took those hostages that were in the Embassy and held them for 180 days, when the Shaw was over turned many people in Iran fled for their lives. From then on the terrorists have spread through out the world. Jimmy Carter was a horrible President.
2006-08-03 15:20:38 · answer #3 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel and all the Arabs are responsible for 50% of all the problems, the other 50% is caused by USA and England.
2006-08-03 15:06:51 · answer #4 · answered by Kee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seems that way,and the more educated you are ,the more right you become. but you know ,Israel is only following a program,one that the u,s,a masterminded long ago terrorist ya i hate them too,and they gots to go ,but damn it you cant kill civilians for any reasons,bush he knew the missiles were their he knew lotes of stuff,all the killing he knew that would happen,the problem in the middle east,= the missiles and the 2 kidnap ed solders..both of these things ,should never have gone as far as they did..i think a percentage to all western country's and u,n ,,and of course all made for you TV by Israel butchers...
2006-08-03 15:23:04 · answer #5 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They seem to be the only ones with their heads on straight. They simply want their own country. Everyone else in the area (until Iraq was freed by the US-led Coalition) wants to erase Israel from the map.
2006-08-03 14:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel was not bothering anyone when the Hezboullah attacked them. I think the other countries are the problem
2006-08-03 15:01:52 · answer #7 · answered by fortyninertu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the United States is, when we went into Iraq we opened up a whole can of worms and now we are going to have to live with the fact that we have started world war l l l
2006-08-03 14:59:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Why should they be? They didn't attack themselves.
We are the idiots who destabilized the region with Iraq, and Lebanon has been harboring terrorist!
2006-08-03 14:59:34 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell no, you know that it is always easier to put the blame on someone else now you know that
2006-08-03 14:59:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋