Bush and Hitler compared?

Question

What kinda stupid person compares them? Bush kills no one. Hitler killed 6 million jews. Did bush? No Is Bush a dictactor? No Was Hitler? Yes

And shows how desperate they are to stoop to that level.

And remember...This is a question to answer not correct my spelling. This is yahoo answers not yahoo school

Answer 1

You are right. The ppl comparing Bush to Hitler should be the ones comparing Hitler to themselves.

Answer 2

Hitler didn't start out killing Jews from his first day in office. It took him a while. But lets look at the similarities between Bush and Hitler. Both were elected/selected, Bush by the Supreme Court and Hitler when Hindenburg died. They both had terrorist attacks on there country. Bush 9/11 and Hitler the Reichstag's fire. Both ignored warning of the impending attacks. Both blamed foreign ideologues. Both made speeches right afterwords. Within weeks Bush had the Patriot Act and Hitler had his "Decree on the Protection of People and State". Both had a 4 year sunset provision put on them to get them passed. Both had protesters arrested or put in free speech zones away from the place where they were appearing. Both use the word Homeland to describe the nation. Both claim/claimed to be Christian. Both formed a new agency to consolidate various independent police, intelligence and border agencies together. Bush got Homeland Security and Hitler got the Central Security Office. Bush has the Secret Service as a National Police force and Hitler had the SchutzStaffel. But brought in industry and forged an alliance, and they got former executives of the nation's biggest companies into government positions. Both use government to empower corporations and reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons, stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, and create an illusion of prosperity through continual and ever-expanding war.
History seems to be repeating!
And before you call me a stupid liberal,I am a liberal but I've studied World War II all of my life. I do know history and I do know what I am talking about.

Answer 3

It's silly to compare Bush and Hitler. Hitler was more articulate and spoke much better English than Bush, even though he didn't speak any English at all.

Hitler did kill lots more people than Bush has. The score stands at about 10 million for Hitler and less than 100,000 for Bush, but of course Bush still has a couple of years left to add to his total. With a little effort and the help of a couple of "nucular" weapons, Dubya could get his numbers up there with Uncle Adolf's.

The other main difference that I can see is the obvious one: Hitler had a mustache.

Answer 4

Hitler may have killed 6 million people and been responsible for the deaths of many more but look how long he was in power. Bush HAS killed people by his actions and policies and is no more or less blameless then Hitler. Does anyone imagine that Hitler killed those people with his own hands?

Answer 5

The Bush to Hitler comparison is quite valid considering his family history with the Nazis. He also was talking about a New World Order (Hitlerian terminology) until someone told him to keep his mouth shut on that topic,

What I would like to see is if there is a comparison between Bush and Attila the Hun or Bush and Genghis Khan.. But maybe none exists because Attila and Genghis were both warriors. bush remains in safety.

Answer 6

True, which is why you can't really believe much that a person who would make such a ridiculous comparison says. Bush is in no way like Hitler, but those who know little about history make foolish claims.

Answer 7

Yeah but Hitler was kind to animals.
Actually Hitler was elected Chancellor with a huge majority due largely to the Depression.
Bush is more of a spokesman for the people who control the military/industrial complex, he does what he is 'advised.'

Answer 8

Lessee now.........

Embrace a large national health care program?

Embrace a large national welfare program?

Embrace harsh, strict controls of business, commerce and employment?

Embrace outlawing the private ownership of firearms?

Embrace identifying races in order to give a race advantage over other races?

I don't agree with everything that Bush does or says but I have to ask, does that sound like Bush? I hardly think so.

Sounds more like Liberals to me.

p.s. Those things mentioned here were all mainstays of the National Socialist Party. (Look up National Socialist Party on Wikipedia.)

Answer 9

You can't really say bush has killed no one. He has. 2800 dead American military and about 60,000 dead Iraqis. That counts. Bush not a dictator? He wants to be able to hold people without bail or trial, against the Constitution, and to even torture them, also against the Constitution. At least Hitler won his elections.

Answer 10

we could see Hitler alongside with Japan and Italy, have been to blame for the deaths of sixty two million human beings in international warfare 2, neither Germa manhattan , nor Italy, nor Japan have been attacked first, yet they have been the aggressors ok now Bush, no longer to blame for any deaths, as we've been attacked first, and not the aggressor, so if Bush is reaction for any deaths, after being attacked, then it may be honest to declare that Roosevelt exchange into to blame for the sixty two million deaths, instead of Hitler, in international warfare 2 the only distinction is that the yankee media exchange into for united states of america lower back then, now all they decide for to do is hearth up concern and could somewhat decide for to record that united states of america isn't any longer a rustic, i believe the yankee media is to blame for 9/11 as lots with the aid of fact the terrorist in case you go with for to ask a competent question, ask American media vs. Hitler, they the two unfold lies and one million/2 truths, and the two are into the propaganda corporation