English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Most intelligent, fair-minded and objective people agree that the 2000 presidential election was stolen (with an assist from the US Supreme Court) by vote manipulation and fraud in Florida. But did the same thing happen again in 2004, this time in Ohio? 'Rolling Stone' makes a very compelling case in support of this argument, which you can check out here: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

2006-08-03 13:00:30 · 12 answers · asked by MacSteed 7 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

We might just find out during Mr. Blackwell's upcoming trial. Supposedly some of the topics on the agenda is his tatics of voter supression and manipulation......for instance, more machines than are needed in weathy districts (read:Republican) and not enough machines in less weathy districts (read:Democratic) that caused huge lines that discouraged people to vote.

2006-08-03 13:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 18 17

Doubtful. There are to many rednecks in this country that supported the Bush propaganda train. And there are plenty that still do. Although some of those who can actually read are finding out some very disturbing things about him.

2006-08-03 13:25:05 · answer #2 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 14 15

i live in Ohio the sec of state ken (taftwell) Blackwell was bush campaign manager here in the state,A female judge running for Ohio supreme Justice (she was a Democrat)had no money to campaign on some how got got more vote than Kerry in Dem.rich county,in the town of Gehenna some how bush got got 4,000 more vote the people vote,In Columbus in Dem,prescient people had to wait for hour,to vote in rep. ter,minute

2006-08-03 13:12:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 13 14

i was disappointed both times...but i feel that the democrats hurt THEMSELVES more by not taking on bush more aggressively...it's over and done with...the thing the dems need to do is nominate stronger candidates...people who aren't afraid to stir things up...time to go on the offense instead of always playing defense...when repubs make an inaccurate claim, stop whining and get in their grills...it's like watching the littlest kid in school, the guy you really want to like, getting pushed around by the class bully-if the guy would just show some backbone, the bully would turn tail and run...no more whiners...which reminds me...as bad as kerry proved to be as a candidate, i truly believe lieberman cost him percentage points he couldn't afford to give up...have you ever heard lieberman speak? he alternates between droning and whining...an absolute disaster every time he opens his mouth...

2006-08-03 13:13:39 · answer #4 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 14 15

Any answer to the contrary would not count in your opinion anyway. Your mind is made, and so is mine. You are just looking for affirmation to your opinion. I can't in all good conscious give it.

2006-08-03 13:09:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 19 14

Some think so. See Links:

2006-08-03 13:08:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 12 13

Yes.

But here's the kicker--both Bush and Kerry are members of the Skull and Bones cult, so given that it doesn't really matter.

(I voted Constitution Party.)

2006-08-03 13:06:35 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 14 15

Neither was stolen. If anyone had any REAL proof that is was, Bush would not be in power.

2006-08-03 13:05:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 19 14

,

2006-08-03 13:15:54 · answer #9 · answered by Heroic Liberal 1 · 12 15

LOL, consider the source.

2006-08-03 13:09:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 15 16

fedest.com, questions and answers