2006-08-03 11:43:15 · 21 answers · asked by Marlien 2 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
The only in your question implies a design flaw - as though a higher number was preferable. 2 appear the norm both in design and function.
2006-08-03 14:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Because if we had any other number we would ask the same question. If we had 3, we'd say, woudlnt it be wierd to have only 2 balls, then start laughing. or if we had only 1, we would say, hey wouldn't it be wierd to have an extra ball?
2006-08-03 11:48:46 · answer #2 · answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have enough problems with the 2 I have. If I had 3, I would never get anything done.
Also, it would be impossible for that many to fit in a woman's mouth!
2006-08-03 12:09:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lots of men dont have any at all. Lots of women have bigger balls than men. Quite often actually.
2006-08-03 11:50:23 · answer #4 · answered by Moi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One would not balance us out and 3 would make us walk funny.
Come on. We have 2's of other things and 1's of other things. Who knows.
2006-08-03 11:49:20 · answer #5 · answered by watty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
imagine the pain if you had 3 and got a kick
anyway there is only two side pockets in a pair of trousers
2006-08-03 12:17:18 · answer #6 · answered by Aonarach 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some have one and some have none but two is a nice round number !
2006-08-03 11:56:03 · answer #7 · answered by any 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because two is the easiest to juggle with!
2006-08-03 11:47:31 · answer #8 · answered by blondie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one for a back up?
we have two of a lot of things. arms, legs, feet, hands, kidneys, ears. balance ?
2006-08-03 14:05:21 · answer #9 · answered by marzipanchan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cos were not good at multi-tasking?
2006-08-03 11:52:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋