Condoleezza Rice or Hillary Clinton for President?

Question

who'd you vote for and why?

Answer 1

wow, hmmm, thats a toughy,...I say Oprah Winfrey for president, and Stedman as the first man, her girl Gail as Vice President, and that blonde guy on queer eye for the str8 guy as Secretary of Interior Decorating, and Janet Reno as Best Man, and Mel Gibson as Secretary of Defensive Drunk Driving, and Starr Jones as Secretary of Unemployment. ;-)

Answer 2

Well if Condi were more broadly focused then I might consider her, but she seems to be focused on only the things she likes. That's not good for a President, look at the mess her boss made. As for Hillary. Well I don't know. We all thought she was a big influence on Bill, but when you look back to Ronald Reagan you see the same thing from Nancy. That being said, she is just starting to really learn how to be a force in Congress. She needs to stay there for a while, and learn the lesson George Bush the son didn't. She also needs to find some really powerful friends that are smart and really care about America, instead of a bunch who only seem interested in the profit margin like right now. Right now and in 2008 I don't think I would vote for either. But in 2012 if one or both do there homework then yes I might very well vote for them. I am looking for a good Presidential Candidate to vote for. Gender or ethnicity means nothing to me. All that matters is al they the best thing going for America. I think we all are tired of having to pick the lesser of two evils in this new millennium. However if Bill Clinton ever becomes President of the United Nations then I might very well vote for Hillary Clinton. I know it sounds scary at first, but think of the possibilities.

One more thing. Superman you make a good case, but with all that energy you come off like a megalomaniac. If your serious about starting a new party then do it and run. But get some experience so you can see exactly what kind of bureaucratic bull crap you will be dealing with in your campaign and your term if you win. I might even vote for you if I think you can get it done.
But I will tell you right now you don't understand a lot of things. You may like my saying that but it is true. Have you ever run for an office? I haven't either, but i have helped a Friend run for office. And it involves much more than you can imagine. You propose solutions with no research on what will happen when you cut out everything. Money is also based on credit. You can't just print it so you can right checks. If you flood the economy with too much paper then you drown our dollars credit rating, because when you have too much of anything you weaken it. That goes double for currency. Read up on the theories of economics, and read some Thomas Jefferson while your at it.

Answer 3

Hillary Clinton. Because Rice is fit President Bush.

Answer 4

Clinton, she is an intelligent strong woman, that is not afraid to stand up for what is right for the country. She would have an excellent adviser in her husband. The last legally elected president and also the most successful in the last 40 years at the job of running the government.

Rice would just bring George Bush's failed idea's back and I do not think that America could stand 4 more years of that without complete collapse

Answer 5

I'd like to keep Georgie around, but since that isn't possible, I'll settle for Condi.

Given that any such election would yield the very first female president, it would have powerful historical significance. Yes, Senator Clinton has some accomplishments of her own to speak of, but I'd rather see someone whose political notoriety wasn't primarily attributable to her association with a powerful husband. That totally offends my feminist sensibilities. A president needs to have a public persona not dependent on personal relationships. Condi's notoriety can't be credited to a man.

Also, we need a TOUGH president. Hillary can talk tough, but I'm not sure I trust her to follow through on foreign policy crises. How is she going to force terrorists to their heels or stand up to allies whose agenda is inconsistent with America's best interests and security when she can't even give an ultimatum to a philandering husband?

Answer 6

Condoleeza Rice...she's smarter than Hillary. If Hillary gets in, we might as well just put a big welcome mat outside the border that says "Terrorists welcomed here with open arms". Come on, her husband had the chance to grab Osama 6 TIMES from the Sudanese government but he turned it down. If their top priority isn't the War on Terror then they don't deserve to be president. We need someone who will protect us. Quite honestly, I would be perfectly happy if Bush got to be president for another 8 years. There hasn't been an attack on AMERICAN SOIL since 9/11. He's obviously doing his job, keeping us safe. Period.

Answer 7

I'm not old enough, but if I was, I would probably choose Hilary Clinton. I know, everyone elses is probably different, but I like my choice because, I think she deserves to be The President. (Well, At least she'll be better than Mr. George W. Bush, who I absolutely do not like.) And, I've heard very little about Condloeezza Rice, so that's pretty much why Hilary was my choice.

Answer 8

Condoleezza Rice, more experience in world affairs. Hillary is a crook and a socialist.

Answer 9

I hate to say this because I know a lot of women will hate me, but I don't want a female president. I have worked for some ambitious women before and it can get pretty nasty and a lot of times they hate other women as much as they hate men.
But of the two I would say Condoleezza Rice

Answer 10

Hillary Clinton, knows more, she is nice and will make a great US woman president. She has the knowledge and power. Rice is ugly.

Answer 11

Condoleezza Rice - I feel she cares more about the welfare of the country and less about her personal advancement in politics. She has the "negotiate first and war is a last resort but may still be necessary" state of mind. I like her.