English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally i think that if these savages want to wipe each other out i think we should pull out and leave them to it then after they have used all there arms and bombs go in and restore order.

Whats your opinion???????

Iraq is more likely to slide into civil war than turn into a democracy, Britain's outgoing ambassador to Baghdad wrote in a leaked diplomatic cable, the BBC reported on Thursday.

William Patey's final cable from Baghdad gives a far more pessimistic assessment for prospects in Iraq than Britain has disclosed in public. It warns of the prospect of Shi'ite militia forming a "state within a state", like Hizbollah
in Lebanon.

2006-08-03 10:12:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

OIL OIL OIL what a load of tosh,the usual Tree hugging answer to the war in Iraq...

2006-08-03 10:21:09 · update #1

12 answers

My opinion is that we've created a huge mess that will be a festering ****-hole for the next twenty to thirty years and a prime breeding ground for new terrorists. Democracy will never work in Iraq. Too many tribal feuds and entanglements for a Democracy to work.

2006-08-03 10:19:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

did US received a divine or so from god to act freely whenever and wherever it wishes?
Did UN authorized US to attack Iraq ?
if just because of overnight wishes and willingness, then, we should tear off the international law, dissolve the UN and let the stronger rule, as it is was before 200 years or so.

Iraq is not, and was never, an ally of USA, a US state, or a possession of USA.

Instead people should think to create another polee like Soviet Union, maybe the US people will again live the phobia of nuclear attack, but in the other hand, the rest of the world will breath peacefully as this will repell adventurous and imperial ambitions of the US

2006-08-06 10:41:37 · answer #2 · answered by mutaisemh 2 · 0 0

I'm in favor of downsizing to a support role..keep some military in country to monitor the situation and offer assistance to non-combatants, but let Iraqis figure out what they want otherwise.

Not in favor of pulling out entirely, though, just because the location is too strategic in light of all the other crap that could come down at any minute. Just put up tall fences and bright lights around US installations.

2006-08-03 17:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by Woz 4 · 0 0

I am from Iraq .Forgive me because my week English.To answer your question , there are alot of things you have to know. There was no problems with Iraqi ex-regime as the American administration showed before the war, there was no problemes between the groups of the Iraqi people, each member was free to do what he believe, there was a very high margin of safety, services, rights, etc..But when the Us forces entered Iraq, and destroy the state, the situation become to change. In addition to this, US policy opened all the doors for Iran . and for Iraqis which working to Iran, these people have their agenda which certainly differ from the benefit of Iraq. You know there was a war between Iraq and Iran for 8 years, and the Iranian want to revenge, in addition to the historic problem between them. Now, who pushing people to the civilian war, ar USA and Iran. Iran, because they want to cut the south of Iraq and consider it as a part of their imperior. USA, because they need th slow the pressure of Iraqi resistant. Do you know wahts the real number of American solder which killed in Iraq? the number today exceeds 33 thousands. I think the solution of the problem of USA and Iraq is That the usa force have to leave Iraq as soon as that possible.

2006-08-03 17:42:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

everything you have stated is correct. The problem would be that everyone would blame the US for all of the killing (even though we are not the ones doing it) and that a the country would be taken over by a terror group ( maybe an arm of the Iranians) and would be even more dangerous than any country today. They would be able to sell billions in oil to fund their terrorist ways.

2006-08-03 17:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by d h 2 · 0 0

The Ottomans themselves knew not to mess with Iraq. They plunked a puppet governor in there and took off.

It's astounding to me that nobody in the administration/military circles seems to have studied Middle East history.

Oh, and: they're not savages. Perhaps you should read some history too. Introduce yourself to other cultures, man.

2006-08-03 17:24:44 · answer #6 · answered by Gremlin 4 · 0 0

Once we have drained all the black gold from the soil will we leave, and only then, do not kid yourself. Oil is the only reason anybody other than the iraqies is there.

2006-08-03 17:18:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iraqi's said they wanted America there ... said they would welcome our Troops with open arms of gratitude and would fight side by side with us to topple Saddam. Unfortunately, they lied.

More unfortunate, is the fact the Bush Administration is more concerned with "saving face" than to hand that country back to those who betrayed us ... to let them deal with it on their own.

America got called in to do the dirty work, then got left to eat crow.

I say, Turn Saddam loose on them.

2006-08-03 21:33:41 · answer #8 · answered by pickle head 6 · 0 0

My opinion is we need to stay out of it. As always it seems we have our nose in it as if to tell them all how to run their countries. Let them kill eachtother, that is what they have wanted to do for how long. We will have them all hating us for trying to medle and will get ourselves in some kind of war with them if we dont stay out of it and mind our own business like taking care of our own country.

2006-08-03 17:33:41 · answer #9 · answered by yeppers 5 · 0 0

I personally have felt we should get completely out fo the Middle East and let them blow the crap out of one another.

They only have themselves to blame.

2006-08-03 17:17:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers