English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-03 09:13:36 · 13 answers · asked by fireflameguitar 2 in Entertainment & Music Music

13 answers

Lennon...even though he is a good singer

2006-08-03 09:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by lax4life0022 2 · 3 1

The bigger jerk is John Lennon! All the way!

2006-08-03 09:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know if I would use the term jerk but from personal experience - I would have to say Paul. I operated the only licensed Beatles museum in the United States. (One of four in the world) I received items for the museum from Yoko Ono and her staff but after four attempts and four written rejections, I never received anything from Paul McCartney's camp. In fact, he was the only Beatle that did not send anything to the museum, and I'm even counting the rest of the Quarry Men - they all send some little item - but nothing from Paul, not even an autographed photo.

2006-08-03 09:30:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

John Lennon for abandoning his oldest son for a music career, imo.

2006-08-03 09:16:55 · answer #4 · answered by Vosot 3 · 0 0

I think Lennon acted out more. McCartney's jerkiness had more to do with business.

2006-08-03 09:18:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

john lennon

2006-08-03 09:17:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lennon was great in so many ways, but nobody in that group could top him in the jerk department. He could be a real A-Hole when he chose to be.

2006-08-03 09:21:32 · answer #7 · answered by Crooks Gap 5 · 0 0

well they are both awsome, but i would have to say lennon is more of a jerk

2006-08-03 09:17:44 · answer #8 · answered by yams 2 · 0 0

JOHN LENNON

2006-08-03 09:18:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lennon, by FAR.

2006-08-03 09:16:36 · answer #10 · answered by DomC 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers