How many of you who are pro-war use violence to settle your disputes? I don't care WHY you justify the war, I just want to know if you use the same tactics to settle disputes in YOUR life.
2006-08-03 09:11:14 · 7 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
therandman, That is why you will be my closest advisor! We need some of that Number 1 !
2006-08-03 09:31:03 · update #1
VP Ethan, you may...
2006-08-03 09:32:21 · update #2
Number 1 - I can actually talk and reason with the people who I have disputes with - so therefore violence is not needed. I am also man enough to admit when I am wrong and I know how to agree to disagree - but you already knew that.
Number 2 - If you cross the line and physically harm any of my family - I will use whatever means necessary to remove them from harm.
2006-08-03 09:23:28 · answer #1 · answered by therandman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If there were no other way, or if the situation demanded expediency (such as if my life were being threatened someone or if someone were trying to assault me) I would. In this country, there are legal remedies and a court system for solving disputes. It's a system that is mutually accepted (if not completely revered) by all parties. That's why it can be used to solve domestic disputes. There is no such system to solve international disputes.
I'll give a good example of what I mean by expediency. Here is a "question" posed by a deranged liberal: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Atu_1f2.PqkVly9p.dGG9Wfsy6IX?qid=20060730105931AAgNU4A
If the asker of the above question actually did what he claimed, and I were the guy he assaulted, I think I'd use a little force to resolve the issue - then I'd call the cops.
2006-08-03 09:19:12 · answer #2 · answered by Will 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you care how we settle disputes in our life? I am pro-war all the way! Talking about stuff to settle disputes hardly ever works out. If you look at WWII we really didn't have a choice when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. What else could we have done? Called up Japan and said "Hey please don't attack us anymore. It's not nice." Sometimes war is just necessary.
2006-08-03 09:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by Luekas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is an excellent tool when used properly. Do I generally settle disputes with violence? No. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't if the situation called for it.
2006-08-03 09:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pro-war, pro-this-war, and pro-any war against the terrorists
I'm proud to say i've only been in one fight
I decline many fights, but I speak up and tell them how it is before I get into a fight.
Many of the people that have tried to fight me have been juvenile in nature (Fat white kids, blacks, you name it, the whole stereotype avenue) And I told them how it is and declined the fight.
Edit:
I didn't say they were ALL like that
I'm just saying i've encountered your MTV blacks and your fat white kids who think they're badass, all the stereotypes
I'm friends with two fat white guys who I think are cool as crap, same with some black guys
Sorry if you misunderstood.
2006-08-03 09:16:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Pres. . .May I call you Pres? Anyway I don't think you are comparing apples to apples here and yes there are situations that I would resort to violence to solve a problem if someone were to threaten my life or the lives of my family I would resort to violence but if someone cut me off in traffic no.
2006-08-03 09:30:52 · answer #6 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it disturbing that Recycled Goat just basically called fat white kids and blacks juvenile in nature. I don't understand. Maybe instead of turning to violence, they can also turn to prejudice.
2006-08-03 09:18:25 · answer #7 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋