English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-03 08:56:03 · 7 answers · asked by matt 1 in Health Men's Health

7 answers

I think you should stop listening to these guys that say circumcised is cleaner, even though they probably never even had a foreskin before and don't know how it feels.

Circumcised penises ARE NOT as clean as an uncircumcised one, as long as the uncut one is kept clean, which is very easy to clean.

You think smegma causes cancer? Well guess what, smegma really isn't that unhealthy stuff that you hear about all the time. Smegma actually cleans the penis, keeps it soft and smooth...but since women don't like the look of smegma just take a shower before having sex...simple.

Who is to say that circumcised is more attractive...most women wouldn't mind anyway, and some women even like uncircumcised better...Anyway if you want to look like a circumcised penis, just pull back your foreskin...not much of a difference right?

Bigger possibility of getting STD's if you are uncircumcised...TRUE...But that's why you wear a condom! (Duh!)

In conclusion, neither are better, and both are the same...I know this from experience, information, surveys, science, doctors, etc.

2006-08-05 18:56:29 · answer #1 · answered by nmagny 4 · 0 0

Like all things, it depends. Uncircumcised is better because it's what every guy's born with and it increases sensitive; however, if one has recurrent and severe problems, being circumcised is clearly better.

The foreskin just has a lot of negative myths surrounding it which convinces many that the circumcised is better. For example, smegma does need to be washed away daily, but in small amounts it does not increase infection and certainly isn't carcinogenic. The foreskin isn't significantly more prone to getting infections or STDs on the whole. It's also very easy to keep clean, easier than say brushing one's teeth. Very few people will actually need to be circumcised for medical reasons.

So basically, if you're uncircumcised, you probably won't have many problems (if any). And you've the added benefit of more sensation. If you're circumcised, unless something went wrong (and it can happen), it shouldn't hinder you noticably.

2006-08-03 18:37:17 · answer #2 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 0 0

I like circumcised as it is better

2006-08-04 19:57:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

CIRCUMCISED!! When the penis is not, in my opinion, and most women, it's very unattractive, and can get smelly, PUUU. Like that episode from Sex and the City when they referred to an uncircumcised penis as a Sharpe dog.

2006-08-03 16:30:40 · answer #4 · answered by funkygurll 3 · 0 0

I believe not circumsized, as the penis is much more sensitive when it's intact. However, if a man doesn't keep an intact penis clean, then he's at risk of contracting an infection.

2006-08-03 16:01:24 · answer #5 · answered by cjsmommy 5 · 0 0

Circumcision is good because smegma may cause genital cancer.

2006-08-03 16:06:49 · answer #6 · answered by Ovaga 3 · 0 0

god put that hood on for a reason....

2006-08-03 16:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers