President Clinton created a government agency to search for bin Laden before he left office. Just a couple of months ago President Bush closed up shop and told everyone to quit looking. Who's this guy (Bush) working for, bin Laden or America?
2006-08-03 07:00:46 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
after all OBL is from a powerful family engaged in oil business.
2006-08-03 07:05:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden is a man of his word. A terrorist to be sure but he has no reason to lie, especially about the WTC and 9/11.
He denys having anything to do with it. Mmnnn then who did? Has anyone seen the 16foot hole in the pentagon that a 767 at full speed supposedly made? It's a crock. Also, several of the supposed terrorists that were on the planes that hit the WTC have been seen since that happened. There is proof.
Could our government have concocted this supposed terrorist attack so they could take away our civil rights and take control of this country? To far fetched to beleive? Hitler and the Nazis did almost the exact same thing when they took over the democracy that was Germany. They faked a bombing, blamed it on terrorists and then started taking control. You can see where that led. And we are following close behind.
W isn't looking for Bin Laden because that's not his goal.
2006-08-03 14:50:43 · answer #2 · answered by Imaginer 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
kmb6917's response made complete sense Suntan Superman.
Al-Qaeda is Bin Laden's network of terror. See web page below. Our military is still looking for Bin Laden. If they were not then how come we killed Zarqawi in June of 2006. In 2004 Zarqawi aligned his group with Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. They are all intertwined and we are picking them off one by one. I would assume that the government agency is no longer needed as the military is handling it - just a guess, nothing to back that up.
2006-08-03 15:55:14 · answer #3 · answered by Karen B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, kmb6917, Al Qaeda is under Saddam Hussein, who hates bin Laden. Your argument makes no sense. As for the question, Bush and bin Laden are in cahoots. Don't be suprised if you see them suntanning on the White House lawn.
2006-08-03 14:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason is: Bush is only concerned with Iraq because Sadam wanted to change from the Petrol Dollar to petrol Euros. Everything else is unimportant including terrorism. Clinton tried to fire rockets at Bin Ladens training camp and the Republicans said it was to cover up his affair.
2006-08-03 14:08:32 · answer #5 · answered by dononvan_666 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yo kmb, heard of the news? It wasn't long ago that Bush called the CIA off of Osama. Sorry. And why? He doesn't care for the man, just like he doesn't care for Sudan or any other terrorist. And his whole purpose with meddling in the Israeli-Lebanese mix is another chance at them "moslem sandniggers". Mentality of a madman.
A logical comparison, if I must. Think of Prescott Bush as president during WW2. Nazi Germany attacks us. Now he's a supporter of Nazi Germany, but this is the perfect excuse for an all-out attack on an already weakened Soviet Union, who we hated all along. Make sense.
2006-08-03 17:31:15 · answer #6 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the princeling (bin laden) is family of those who keep all the executives (bush, cheney, rumsy, rice, clarke, perle, shummer, ect) oil rich & in power. without them their empires would fall. there are many faces of these wars. the saudis want the region destabilized to eliminate oil competition & capture political influence as well as steal resources. the israelis want to move through into iraq in order to free themselves of the wests support & prophesize the bible. the usa is working for both saudis & israel. to work them against themselves would be optimal but we are doing the spending of lives & money. we want war with iran because it will shake everything up from syria to pakistan. if they can all be thrashed well enough, an AU/MEU (like the EU) could be formed, standardized & ruled by the us, uk, & un. none of the things being said about iran are true, see un inspectiors & sunni/shiia histories. we've been winning the war in iraq for 3 years, 26 died in throughout iraq today, so far. the bottom line is its our money & our blood they are spending. why do we give it so willingly? do you really believe a sunni click is gonna take over & rule everything from egypt to india? do you really think they will invade us when they cant defend themselves? theres more bloods & crypts than al quieda and theyre better armed. the krishnas already have the airports. no big govrtnment, no unlimited power, no fear generated by propaganda. we cant be free if we cant be brave.
2006-08-03 14:37:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Still looking for Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. Still have troops deployed for it. Your story was not complete in its reporting. Pretty sure Bush is on our side.
2006-08-03 14:08:51 · answer #8 · answered by kmb6917 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was never looking for bin Laden, he only used that as a reason to go to Iraq! He played on the people's sensibilities and pain, and used it as a camaflauge for is real intention - to finish off where his daddy left off. And the bombing of the towers was just the springboard he needed.
And unfortunately it worked!! To this day, people still believe that this war is about Sept 11! Couldn't be further from the truth
2006-08-03 14:09:46 · answer #9 · answered by Pask 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i believe this is a man who is trying to prioritize his Middle East agenda... first there was the ouster of saddam hussein, who said the first time he had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, but because of the injustices he represented over there, he was the whipping post and poster child for a free iraq... then there were the half azzed attempts to go one a M.E. wide hunt for osama...who we all know has oil ties to the bush family... hell they havent denied it, and its been in their faces for a while now... if this government can spy on its own people, you would think they could take those same damn satellites and go spy somewhere else that needs spying on... considering all of our modern technology... but i digress... then theres every little conflict thats going on between each ideological variation the hamas, and the shi'ites and the shi'a and all of them who think differently about their own religious beliefs... (these are a religious people after all and their gripes are about mostly interreligious differences... THEN outsiders in their personal internal affairs)....now we have the israeli and the lebanese and the palestinians...
i think that the CIC just wanted to prioritize the B.S. he got himself... and the rest of the world... into
he can try to stack the sh*t like a game of Jenga and it still makes no sense
for a good movie to wattch... it will get you thinking... V for Vendetta... get it..love it... its facts
sincerely...( V )
2006-08-03 14:17:15 · answer #10 · answered by rage ( V ) 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's because our president is a moron who has Attention Deficit Disorder. He probably saw something shiny and forgot all about Bin Laden. (I didn't vote for Bush, I voted for Kerry.)
2006-08-03 14:06:23 · answer #11 · answered by faerycatcher 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋