English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

with the way that Israel flys around slaughtering young children and women and other civilians, is Israel the greatest threat to world peace ?

2006-08-03 05:57:36 · 18 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Not at all.You do know Israel was attacked by Hezbollah don't you? Why is it not the radical muslims,who refuse peace because their stated goal is to kill all jews and western infidels not the problem here? Do you understand there is a war going on between radical Islamists and the western world? Did Hezbollah fire rockets,and send suicide bombers to kill Syrians when they invaded and ran lebanon for the last 5-6 years? NO. Why not, they were an invading force? Oh because they weren't jewish or Americans.THIS IS A WAR!

2006-08-03 06:13:38 · answer #1 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 0 1

The greatest threat to world peace is the continued absence of the Khilafah system. Muslims need to learn their Islamic history of how Islam ruled three fouths of the world allowing jews and christians to practice thier religion and defending them if faced by outside aggressors. Islam is not a theocracy. It is a complete ideological system addressing all of mankinds affairs.

Present day activities makes non-muslims unaware and nervous as to what the Shariah truly holds for them.
The media consistently focus on the punishments ( o' where are the rights for the criminal?) rather than the system as a whole.

To muslims: Stop falling for the shia/sunni division crap. The khilafah was ruled by shia khalifahs in the past and can be under one now. Unite Akhwaan.

Propaganda is a powerful tool,so too is knowledge.

2006-08-03 06:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by mumin azraaq 2 · 0 0

If israel were going around 'slaughtering civilians', why is the count for civilians only 700 at best estimates?

Slaughter is thousands of dead. Have you forgotten real war, real genocide, 6 million dead in the Holocaust, look at the Sudan if you want 'real genocide'.

Who is the greatest threat then?

Terrorists. Terrorists who hide in cities and do not actually command the WHOLE of Lebanon, but command some, and hide with civilians causing civilians to be killed as well.

There's your real threat.

And there's your real massacre.

2006-08-03 06:02:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, the real threat is the perception that the USA will support Israel to the end, regardless of Israel's actions. That perception is undermining what could have been a stabilizing voice in the Middle East.

2006-08-03 06:11:14 · answer #4 · answered by oldbutcrafty 2 · 0 0

If the Hezbos fire their rockets from locations in the middle of "young children and women and other civilians," who is to blame if harm comes to those young children, women and other civilians? For years the Hezbos and other groups like them have been hiding in the civilian population firing their rockets or other similar acts only to cry foul if Israel retaliates. 95% or better of the rockets that the Hezbos fire at Israel are so poorly guided that they have no real idea where they will land. At least the Israel military are targeting places from which the Hezbos have been firing.

2006-08-03 06:10:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Its not just about Israel
.Bush has strange views about the Middle East and other regimes, governments...
Although people are the greatest threat to world peace , dont you think so?

2006-08-03 06:20:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Israel is the parent of peace in the midsection East, and every physique who does not get this, needless to say does not comprehend what somewhat occurs obtainable. like a number of democracies, Israel is dedicated to scuffling with terrorism - that's why united states of america helps her. Israel is tiny; smaller than Wales. She strives for peace yet is compelled to handle rabid lunatics who prepare their toddlers, from beginning, to hate Israel. Witness the certainty that the Palestinians have purely elected a terrorist team (Hamas) as their formal representatives. you will under no circumstances hear of an Israeli sending a suicide bomber into London or long island or certainly everywhere. Likewise, you will under no circumstances hear Israel vowing to wipe yet another united states of america off the map. assessment this with Iran, working example, a rustic dedicated to destroying Israel. Israel is a huge gamble in basic terms to those that seek for to reason mass loss of life of innocents. I.E. terrorists.

2016-10-01 10:35:26 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I would think its Persia. Oh I'm sorry its Iran. They want to go back when mullahs ruled and people were nothing more than peasants that the ruling class could treat as they wished. Pathetic washed up men playing God pretending to be divine prophets and messengers of of Allah. I'd laugh at the stupidity of the Iranian people if it wasn't so sad and dangerous. They have the second largest reserve of oil and yet the poverty and unemployment is unbelievable. Yes the asylum is run by the patients.

2006-08-03 06:12:06 · answer #8 · answered by purplehays 2 · 0 0

Oh my goodness. Does any liberals understand who was attacked first? Israel was attacked first. The reason civilians are dying is because they are being used as human shields or they didn't leave. Understand it now? Prez Dumbass

2006-08-03 06:01:56 · answer #9 · answered by Ah Ha 3 · 0 0

anybody that tells me that destorying a whole country and killing 700 innocent people and terrorizing and uprooting an entire population makes you not a threat to world peace - You need to take your head out of your A S S!! INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE!!!

2006-08-03 06:08:50 · answer #10 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers