They are remarkably the same person. I prefer Bush, he will be gone in 2+ years, who knows how long the world will have to put up with crazy Kim.
2006-08-03 05:35:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush, who I hate, is better than Kim Jung IL hands down. Kim is a lunatic who is hopped up on Hennessey all the time. His isolationism is frought with corruption and he abuses his only resource the people.
Bush on the other hand just ushered along new world order type ideas. He is considerably better than Kim in, using his resources, which America has much more natural resources than just people. The problem comes about when your trashing everything in your way on the trip to the bank. Bush will profit severly after his presidency. I would be dissappointed if the unfortunates voted for a Condi Rice ticket in 08.
2006-08-03 12:38:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by sleepylew2002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're comparing George Bush with Kim Jong IL???? How much of a liberal, uneducated idiot are you (but you're probably 13 years old so I would not expect you to know the first thing about international politics)
2006-08-03 12:30:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to do a little more research on Kim. If you still see this question as reasonable then see your doctor....
2006-08-03 14:50:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by roeskats 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The puppet version of Kim in Team America.
I'm so rone-rey...
2006-08-03 12:34:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Better at what?
2006-08-03 12:29:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
, Nobody is better, for different reasons
2006-08-03 12:31:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋